Role of denosumab before resection and reconstruction in giant cell tumors of bone: a single-centered retrospective cohort study

Background Denosumab has been approved by Food and Drug Authority in 2013 for use in surgically unresectable Giant cell tumor (GCT) to achieve resectable tumor margins. The aim of this study is to investigate the functional outcome and surgical convenience with the use of neoadjuvant denosumab befor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology 2022-04, Vol.32 (3), p.567-574
Hauptverfasser: Sahito, Badaruddin, Ali, Sheikh Muhammad Ebad, Kumar, Dileep, Kumar, Jagdesh, Hussain, Nauman, Lakho, Tahir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Denosumab has been approved by Food and Drug Authority in 2013 for use in surgically unresectable Giant cell tumor (GCT) to achieve resectable tumor margins. The aim of this study is to investigate the functional outcome and surgical convenience with the use of neoadjuvant denosumab before resection and reconstruction in Campanacci grade III GCT. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 70 cases of Campanacci grade III GCT receiving resection and reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2019. They were stratified into two groups: one group of 29 patients received once-weekly denosumab 120 mg for 4-weeks before resection and reconstruction, while the other group of 41 patients did not receive denosumab before resection and reconstruction. Quality of life by musculoskeletal tumor society score where 0–7 means poor, 8–14 means fair, 15–22 means good; above 22 means excellent, incidence of tumor recurrence, intraoperative duration in minutes and postoperative positive margins were assessed for each cohort after 12 months follow-up. Results There was no significant difference in musculoskeletal tumor society score (25.75 vs. 27.41; P   = 0.178), incidence of recurrence (3.45% vs. 4.88%; P   
ISSN:1633-8065
1432-1068
DOI:10.1007/s00590-021-03012-1