Critical assessment of rapid methods to qualify supplementary cementitious materials for use in concrete

In this study, several tests for supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) were evaluated to find the best methods to rapidly screen out inert materials, measure overall reactivity, and differentiate between pozzolanicity and latent hydraulicity. The R3 matrix and lime reactivity tests were found...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cement and concrete research 2022-03, Vol.153, p.106709, Article 106709
Hauptverfasser: Al-Shmaisani, Saif, Kalina, Ryan D., Ferron, Raissa Douglas, Juenger, Maria C.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study, several tests for supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) were evaluated to find the best methods to rapidly screen out inert materials, measure overall reactivity, and differentiate between pozzolanicity and latent hydraulicity. The R3 matrix and lime reactivity tests were found to be the most effective at quickly screening out inert materials. However, slow-reacting materials may appear to have low reactivity in both tests and extending the test duration better depicts material reactivity. Additionally, SCMs with higher alumina content perform better in the R3 tests due to the higher heat release and more bound water associated with the formation of calcium aluminate hydrates compared to calcium silicate hydrates, creating reactivity bias when compared to SCMs with lower alumina content. Measuring the calcium hydroxide content of R3 pastes, through thermogravimetric analysis or single point mass loss, can also differentiate between pozzolanic and hydraulic materials.
ISSN:0008-8846
1873-3948
DOI:10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106709