Dual liquid–liquid extraction versus distillation for the production of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass: A techno-economic analysis using pinch technology
[Display omitted] •Pinch analysis reduced the energy consumption significantly.•For corn, dual LLE consumed 29.31 MJ/kg bio-butanol compared to 41.53 MJ/kg in distillation.•Capital investment and utility consumption were higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol production cost was slightly...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Fuel (Guildford) 2022-03, Vol.312, p.122932, Article 122932 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 122932 |
| container_title | Fuel (Guildford) |
| container_volume | 312 |
| creator | Mailaram, Swarnalatha Maity, Sunil K. |
| description | [Display omitted]
•Pinch analysis reduced the energy consumption significantly.•For corn, dual LLE consumed 29.31 MJ/kg bio-butanol compared to 41.53 MJ/kg in distillation.•Capital investment and utility consumption were higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol production cost was slightly higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol was cheaper from lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane.
n-Butanol has emerged as a potential biofuel and promising feedstock for organic chemicals. This study presents a techno-economic comparison of dual liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) with distillation for manufacturing 10,000 MT bio-butanol per annum from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass using pinch technology. The energy consumption per kg of bio-butanol was lower in dual LLE than distillation. However, the dual LLE involves the complex recovery of extractants with high capital investment and utility consumption. The bio-butanol production cost was thus slightly higher for dual LLE than distillation. Despite the high capital investment, the bio-butanol production cost was much lower for lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane due to cheaper feedstock and higher co-product credit. The production cost was, however, higher for corn compared to sugarcane due to higher feedstock cost, additional enzymatic hydrolysis step, and extra cost for enzymes and nutrients. The production cost per kg of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass was USD 1.50, USD 1.11, and USD 0.65 for distillation and USD 1.59, USD 1.19, and USD 0.74 for dual LLE, respectively. The feedstock contributed 53–70% of the production cost with ∼130%, ∼60%, and ∼40% contribution of co-product credit for lignocellulose biomass, sugarcane, and corn, respectively. The profitability analysis was further carried out to obtain the minimum bio-butanol selling price. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122932 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2637165250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016236121027939</els_id><sourcerecordid>2637165250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-425d7582a220baa936b0feb01b40887d86fd27b2098d38a95bc0b6aeb7dade333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhS1EJIaEC7CyxDY9-Ge624PYRAECUqRsYG35p3rGI489cbWjzI47cBquk5Okh86aVZVK36t6pUfIe86WnPHu4245VIhLwQRfciHWUrwiC6562fS8la_Jgk1UI2TH35C3iDvGWK_a1YL8_VJNpDHc1-Cffv-ZGwqPYzFuDDnRByhYkfqAY4jR_JsNudBxC_RQsq8zlgdqQ25sHU3KkQ4l76nLJV1SrBtTnElwSU3y06lNyg5irDEjnER7g_iJXtER3DblBlxOeR_cRJt4xIC0YkgbegjJbV-gmDfHC3I2mIjw7qWek1_fvv68_t7c3t38uL66bZwUamxWovV9q4QRgllj1rKzbADLuF0xpXqvusGL3gq2Vl4qs26tY7YzYHtvPEgpz8mHee_07X0FHPUu1zJ5Qy062fOuFS2bKDFTrmTEAoM-lLA35ag506eI9E6fItKniPQc0ST6PItg8v8QoGh0AZIDHwq4Ufsc_id_BptNoHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637165250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dual liquid–liquid extraction versus distillation for the production of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass: A techno-economic analysis using pinch technology</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mailaram, Swarnalatha ; Maity, Sunil K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mailaram, Swarnalatha ; Maity, Sunil K.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Pinch analysis reduced the energy consumption significantly.•For corn, dual LLE consumed 29.31 MJ/kg bio-butanol compared to 41.53 MJ/kg in distillation.•Capital investment and utility consumption were higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol production cost was slightly higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol was cheaper from lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane.
n-Butanol has emerged as a potential biofuel and promising feedstock for organic chemicals. This study presents a techno-economic comparison of dual liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) with distillation for manufacturing 10,000 MT bio-butanol per annum from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass using pinch technology. The energy consumption per kg of bio-butanol was lower in dual LLE than distillation. However, the dual LLE involves the complex recovery of extractants with high capital investment and utility consumption. The bio-butanol production cost was thus slightly higher for dual LLE than distillation. Despite the high capital investment, the bio-butanol production cost was much lower for lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane due to cheaper feedstock and higher co-product credit. The production cost was, however, higher for corn compared to sugarcane due to higher feedstock cost, additional enzymatic hydrolysis step, and extra cost for enzymes and nutrients. The production cost per kg of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass was USD 1.50, USD 1.11, and USD 0.65 for distillation and USD 1.59, USD 1.19, and USD 0.74 for dual LLE, respectively. The feedstock contributed 53–70% of the production cost with ∼130%, ∼60%, and ∼40% contribution of co-product credit for lignocellulose biomass, sugarcane, and corn, respectively. The profitability analysis was further carried out to obtain the minimum bio-butanol selling price.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>ABE fermentation ; Bio-butanol ; Biofuels ; Biomass ; Butanol ; Corn ; Distillation ; Dual liquid–liquid extraction ; Economic analysis ; Economics ; Energy consumption ; Extractants ; Lignocellulose ; Liquid-liquid extraction ; Nutrients ; Organic chemicals ; Organic chemistry ; Pinch analysis ; Production costs ; Profitability ; Raw materials ; Sugarcane ; Techno-economic analysis ; Technology utilization ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 2022-03, Vol.312, p.122932, Article 122932</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Mar 15, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-425d7582a220baa936b0feb01b40887d86fd27b2098d38a95bc0b6aeb7dade333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-425d7582a220baa936b0feb01b40887d86fd27b2098d38a95bc0b6aeb7dade333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236121027939$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mailaram, Swarnalatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maity, Sunil K.</creatorcontrib><title>Dual liquid–liquid extraction versus distillation for the production of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass: A techno-economic analysis using pinch technology</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>[Display omitted]
•Pinch analysis reduced the energy consumption significantly.•For corn, dual LLE consumed 29.31 MJ/kg bio-butanol compared to 41.53 MJ/kg in distillation.•Capital investment and utility consumption were higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol production cost was slightly higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol was cheaper from lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane.
n-Butanol has emerged as a potential biofuel and promising feedstock for organic chemicals. This study presents a techno-economic comparison of dual liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) with distillation for manufacturing 10,000 MT bio-butanol per annum from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass using pinch technology. The energy consumption per kg of bio-butanol was lower in dual LLE than distillation. However, the dual LLE involves the complex recovery of extractants with high capital investment and utility consumption. The bio-butanol production cost was thus slightly higher for dual LLE than distillation. Despite the high capital investment, the bio-butanol production cost was much lower for lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane due to cheaper feedstock and higher co-product credit. The production cost was, however, higher for corn compared to sugarcane due to higher feedstock cost, additional enzymatic hydrolysis step, and extra cost for enzymes and nutrients. The production cost per kg of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass was USD 1.50, USD 1.11, and USD 0.65 for distillation and USD 1.59, USD 1.19, and USD 0.74 for dual LLE, respectively. The feedstock contributed 53–70% of the production cost with ∼130%, ∼60%, and ∼40% contribution of co-product credit for lignocellulose biomass, sugarcane, and corn, respectively. The profitability analysis was further carried out to obtain the minimum bio-butanol selling price.</description><subject>ABE fermentation</subject><subject>Bio-butanol</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Butanol</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>Dual liquid–liquid extraction</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Extractants</subject><subject>Lignocellulose</subject><subject>Liquid-liquid extraction</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic chemicals</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Pinch analysis</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>Techno-economic analysis</subject><subject>Technology utilization</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1uFDEQhS1EJIaEC7CyxDY9-Ge624PYRAECUqRsYG35p3rGI489cbWjzI47cBquk5Okh86aVZVK36t6pUfIe86WnPHu4245VIhLwQRfciHWUrwiC6562fS8la_Jgk1UI2TH35C3iDvGWK_a1YL8_VJNpDHc1-Cffv-ZGwqPYzFuDDnRByhYkfqAY4jR_JsNudBxC_RQsq8zlgdqQ25sHU3KkQ4l76nLJV1SrBtTnElwSU3y06lNyg5irDEjnER7g_iJXtER3DblBlxOeR_cRJt4xIC0YkgbegjJbV-gmDfHC3I2mIjw7qWek1_fvv68_t7c3t38uL66bZwUamxWovV9q4QRgllj1rKzbADLuF0xpXqvusGL3gq2Vl4qs26tY7YzYHtvPEgpz8mHee_07X0FHPUu1zJ5Qy062fOuFS2bKDFTrmTEAoM-lLA35ag506eI9E6fItKniPQc0ST6PItg8v8QoGh0AZIDHwq4Ufsc_id_BptNoHc</recordid><startdate>20220315</startdate><enddate>20220315</enddate><creator>Mailaram, Swarnalatha</creator><creator>Maity, Sunil K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220315</creationdate><title>Dual liquid–liquid extraction versus distillation for the production of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass: A techno-economic analysis using pinch technology</title><author>Mailaram, Swarnalatha ; Maity, Sunil K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-425d7582a220baa936b0feb01b40887d86fd27b2098d38a95bc0b6aeb7dade333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>ABE fermentation</topic><topic>Bio-butanol</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Butanol</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>Dual liquid–liquid extraction</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Extractants</topic><topic>Lignocellulose</topic><topic>Liquid-liquid extraction</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic chemicals</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Pinch analysis</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>Techno-economic analysis</topic><topic>Technology utilization</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mailaram, Swarnalatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maity, Sunil K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mailaram, Swarnalatha</au><au>Maity, Sunil K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dual liquid–liquid extraction versus distillation for the production of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass: A techno-economic analysis using pinch technology</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>2022-03-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>312</volume><spage>122932</spage><pages>122932-</pages><artnum>122932</artnum><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Pinch analysis reduced the energy consumption significantly.•For corn, dual LLE consumed 29.31 MJ/kg bio-butanol compared to 41.53 MJ/kg in distillation.•Capital investment and utility consumption were higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol production cost was slightly higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol was cheaper from lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane.
n-Butanol has emerged as a potential biofuel and promising feedstock for organic chemicals. This study presents a techno-economic comparison of dual liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) with distillation for manufacturing 10,000 MT bio-butanol per annum from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass using pinch technology. The energy consumption per kg of bio-butanol was lower in dual LLE than distillation. However, the dual LLE involves the complex recovery of extractants with high capital investment and utility consumption. The bio-butanol production cost was thus slightly higher for dual LLE than distillation. Despite the high capital investment, the bio-butanol production cost was much lower for lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane due to cheaper feedstock and higher co-product credit. The production cost was, however, higher for corn compared to sugarcane due to higher feedstock cost, additional enzymatic hydrolysis step, and extra cost for enzymes and nutrients. The production cost per kg of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass was USD 1.50, USD 1.11, and USD 0.65 for distillation and USD 1.59, USD 1.19, and USD 0.74 for dual LLE, respectively. The feedstock contributed 53–70% of the production cost with ∼130%, ∼60%, and ∼40% contribution of co-product credit for lignocellulose biomass, sugarcane, and corn, respectively. The profitability analysis was further carried out to obtain the minimum bio-butanol selling price.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122932</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0016-2361 |
| ispartof | Fuel (Guildford), 2022-03, Vol.312, p.122932, Article 122932 |
| issn | 0016-2361 1873-7153 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2637165250 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | ABE fermentation Bio-butanol Biofuels Biomass Butanol Corn Distillation Dual liquid–liquid extraction Economic analysis Economics Energy consumption Extractants Lignocellulose Liquid-liquid extraction Nutrients Organic chemicals Organic chemistry Pinch analysis Production costs Profitability Raw materials Sugarcane Techno-economic analysis Technology utilization Vegetables |
| title | Dual liquid–liquid extraction versus distillation for the production of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass: A techno-economic analysis using pinch technology |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dual%20liquid%E2%80%93liquid%20extraction%20versus%20distillation%20for%20the%20production%20of%20bio-butanol%20from%20corn,%20sugarcane,%20and%20lignocellulose%20biomass:%20A%20techno-economic%20analysis%20using%20pinch%20technology&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Mailaram,%20Swarnalatha&rft.date=2022-03-15&rft.volume=312&rft.spage=122932&rft.pages=122932-&rft.artnum=122932&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122932&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637165250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637165250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016236121027939&rfr_iscdi=true |