Dual liquid–liquid extraction versus distillation for the production of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass: A techno-economic analysis using pinch technology

[Display omitted] •Pinch analysis reduced the energy consumption significantly.•For corn, dual LLE consumed 29.31 MJ/kg bio-butanol compared to 41.53 MJ/kg in distillation.•Capital investment and utility consumption were higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol production cost was slightly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fuel (Guildford) 2022-03, Vol.312, p.122932, Article 122932
Hauptverfasser: Mailaram, Swarnalatha, Maity, Sunil K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Pinch analysis reduced the energy consumption significantly.•For corn, dual LLE consumed 29.31 MJ/kg bio-butanol compared to 41.53 MJ/kg in distillation.•Capital investment and utility consumption were higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol production cost was slightly higher in dual LLE than distillation.•Bio-butanol was cheaper from lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane. n-Butanol has emerged as a potential biofuel and promising feedstock for organic chemicals. This study presents a techno-economic comparison of dual liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) with distillation for manufacturing 10,000 MT bio-butanol per annum from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass using pinch technology. The energy consumption per kg of bio-butanol was lower in dual LLE than distillation. However, the dual LLE involves the complex recovery of extractants with high capital investment and utility consumption. The bio-butanol production cost was thus slightly higher for dual LLE than distillation. Despite the high capital investment, the bio-butanol production cost was much lower for lignocellulose biomass than corn and sugarcane due to cheaper feedstock and higher co-product credit. The production cost was, however, higher for corn compared to sugarcane due to higher feedstock cost, additional enzymatic hydrolysis step, and extra cost for enzymes and nutrients. The production cost per kg of bio-butanol from corn, sugarcane, and lignocellulose biomass was USD 1.50, USD 1.11, and USD 0.65 for distillation and USD 1.59, USD 1.19, and USD 0.74 for dual LLE, respectively. The feedstock contributed 53–70% of the production cost with ∼130%, ∼60%, and ∼40% contribution of co-product credit for lignocellulose biomass, sugarcane, and corn, respectively. The profitability analysis was further carried out to obtain the minimum bio-butanol selling price.
ISSN:0016-2361
1873-7153
DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122932