FOSSIL. II. The Rotation Periods of Small-sized Hilda Asteroids

Using the high-cadence lightcurves collected from the FOSSIL survey, rotation periods of 17 small (diameter 1 km < D < 3 km) Hilda asteroids (hereinafter Hildas) were obtained. Combined with the previously measured rotation periods of Hildas, a spin-rate limit appears at around 3 hr. Assuming...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal. Supplement series 2022-03, Vol.259 (1), p.7
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Chan-Kao, Chen, Ying-Tung, Fraser, Wesley C., Lehner, Matthew J., Wang, Shiang-Yu, Alexandersen, Mike, Choi, Young-Jun, Granados Contreras, A. Paula, Ito, Takashi, JeongAhn, Youngmin, Ji, Jianghui, Kavelaars, J. J., Kim, Myung-Jin, Lawler, Samantha M., Li, Jian, Lin, Zhong-Yi, Lykawka, Patryk Sofia, Moon, Hong-Kyu, More, Surhud, Muñoz-Gutiérrez, Marco, Ohtsuki, Keiji, Pike, Rosemary E., Terai, Tsuyoshi, Urakawa, Seitaro, Yoshida, Fumi, Zhang, Hui, Zhao, Haibin, Zhou, Ji-Lin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Using the high-cadence lightcurves collected from the FOSSIL survey, rotation periods of 17 small (diameter 1 km < D < 3 km) Hilda asteroids (hereinafter Hildas) were obtained. Combined with the previously measured rotation periods of Hildas, a spin-rate limit appears at around 3 hr. Assuming rubble-pile structures for the Hildas, a bulk density of ∼1.5 g cm −3 is required to withstand this spin-rate limit. This value is similar to that of the C-type asteroids (1.33 g cm −3 ) and higher than the ∼1 g cm −3 bulk density of the Jupiter Trojans. This suggests that the Hildas population may contain more C-type asteroids than expected, and the limit at 3 hr simply reflects the spin-rate limit for C-type asteroids. In addition, a Hilda superfast rotator was found, which has a rotation period of 1.633 hr and an estimated diameter of 0.7 km. This object is unlikely to be explained by a rubble-pile or monolithic structure.
ISSN:0067-0049
1538-4365
DOI:10.3847/1538-4365/ac50ac