Woolwich Terror, Surveillance, and the (Im)Possibility of Islamic Reform
In this essay I argue that Muslims across the board have internalized the Western discourse of the need to reform as a type of self-surveillance and as a means of living and being in the world. I examine the transnational Islamic political group Hizb ut-Tahrir's criticisms of British government...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Islamic and Muslim studies 2017-05, Vol.2 (1), p.98-108 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this essay I argue that Muslims across the board have internalized the Western discourse of the need to reform as a type of self-surveillance and as a means of living and being in the world. I examine the transnational Islamic political group Hizb ut-Tahrir's criticisms of British governmental and media-political pressures on Muslims to reform, and theMarrakech Declarationwhere “hundreds of Muslim scholars and intellectuals from over 120 countries … gathered in Marrakesh … to reaffirm the principles of the Charter of Medina.” According to the declaration, non-Muslims in Muslim-majority countries are to be accorded freedom to live and practice their religions, in keeping with the Prophetic example. I also examine a discussion between the director of the “anti-extremism think tank” The Quilliam Foundation, Maajid Nawaz, and Sam Harris—one of the “Four Horsemen of New Atheism”—published asIslam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue, in which the question of the need for Islamic reform is central. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2470-7066 2470-7074 |
DOI: | 10.2979/jims.2.1.09 |