Can policies aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions help mitigate haze pollution? An empirical analysis of the emissions trading system
Haze pollution is a major cause of serious respiratory health problems, and reducing haze has become increasingly necessary. Additionally, China is the largest carbon emitter worldwide, and the need to improve the country’s energy conservation and emission reduction strategies has become increasingl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2022-02, Vol.24 (2), p.1959-1980 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Haze pollution is a major cause of serious respiratory health problems, and reducing haze has become increasingly necessary. Additionally, China is the largest carbon emitter worldwide, and the need to improve the country’s energy conservation and emission reduction strategies has become increasingly urgent. To reduce CO
2
emissions, China launched an emissions trading system (ETS) pilot program in 2011. Whether this system reduces haze pollution remains unclear and is the focus of this paper. Based on data from 31 provinces and autonomous regions in Chinese mainland from 2000 to 2017, using haze pollution as the dependent variable, this paper uses the difference-in-differences (DID) and propensity score matching-difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) approaches to conduct empirical analyses of the effects of the ETS on haze pollution in pilot provinces and their neighboring provinces. The results show the following. (1) In the pilot areas, the estimated coefficient of PSM-DID is “− 6.29,” indicating that the ETS can alleviate haze pollution in the pilot areas and achieve a win–win situation of controlling haze pollution and promoting CO
2
emission reduction. (2) In the provinces adjacent to the pilot areas, the estimated coefficient of PSM-DID is “− 1.98.” The ETS effectively alleviated local haze pollution, providing a “spillover effect.” (3) Although the ETS was equally effective in controlling haze pollution in the provinces surrounding the pilot areas, its impact on the particulate matter (PM
2.5
) concentration in the provinces surrounding the pilot areas was weaker than that in the pilot areas, and there was a certain lag period. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1387-585X 1573-2975 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10668-021-01515-9 |