Gastric Mucosal Devitalization (GMD): Using the Porcine Model to Develop a Novel Endoscopic Bariatric Approach

Background and Aims As the pig model has similar gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology to humans, we used pigs to create a gastric mucosal devitalization (GMD) model in preparation for clinical translation of this technique as an endoscopic bariatric therapy (EBT). The aims of this study were to d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity surgery 2022-02, Vol.32 (2), p.381-390
Hauptverfasser: Itani, Mohamad I., Oberbach, Andreas, Salimian, Kevan J., Enderle, Markus, Hahn, Hartmut, Abbarh, Shahem, Kendrick, Katherine, Schlichting, Nadine, Anders, Robert A., Besharati, Sepideh, Farha, Jad, Fayad, Lea, Kalloo, Anthony N., Badurdeen, Dilhana, Kumbhari, Vivek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aims As the pig model has similar gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology to humans, we used pigs to create a gastric mucosal devitalization (GMD) model in preparation for clinical translation of this technique as an endoscopic bariatric therapy (EBT). The aims of this study were to determine the ablation parameters and technique for a successful, safe, and feasible large surface area GMD that produces weight loss. Methods We performed GMD using argon plasma coagulation (APC) in 3 phases. Phase 1 assessed the ablation energy required to accomplish selective mucosal ablation using ex vivo pig stomachs ( n  = 2). Phase 2 assessed the optimal percentage of mucosal surface area to be treated and was performed on 10 pigs. Phase 3 assessed feasibility, efficacy, and safety with 8 pigs randomized into GMD ( n  = 4) or sham (SH, n  = 4) and survived for 1 month. Body weights (GMD, n  = 4, SH, n  = 4) were measured daily in phase 3 for 1 month, and relative body weights were calculated and analyzed using one-tailed Student’s t -test. Percent body fat was compared between GMD and SH at baseline and 1 month post-GMD. Results Phase 1 identified the optimal ablation parameters (120 W) that were then used in phase 2. Phase 2 revealed a trend that was suggestive that the optimal percent surface area to ablate was similar to that which is removed at laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. In phase 3, GMD was performed over 70% surface area of the greater curvature of the stomach in four pigs. GMD pigs had significantly lower relative body weight increase compared to SH at 1 month (1.375 ± 0.085 vs 1.575 ± 0.047, p  = 0.0435). MRI showed a significantly lower body fat mass at 1 month in GMD pigs (5.9 ± 0.4% vs 12.7 ± 2.3%, p  = 0.026) compared to SH. Conclusions GMD resulted in decreased weight gain in the GMD group as evidenced by a lower relative body weight at 1 month. GMD in an animal model appears to show promise as a potential weight loss therapy. Graphical Abstract
ISSN:0960-8923
1708-0428
DOI:10.1007/s11695-021-05773-4