The urban governance of autonomous vehicles – In love with AVs or critical sustainability risks to future mobility transitions

Increasingly guided by the use of ICT, the flow of humans and materials, smart cities and autonomous mobility amalgamate into a game changer in urban planning. This paper critically explores the role of autonomous (driverless) vehicles in plans for urban futures. By looking into the urban plans of 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cities 2022-01, Vol.120, p.103504, Article 103504
Hauptverfasser: Grindsted, Thomas S., Christensen, Toke Haunstrup, Freudendal-Pedersen, Malene, Friis, Freja, Hartmann-Petersen, Katrine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Increasingly guided by the use of ICT, the flow of humans and materials, smart cities and autonomous mobility amalgamate into a game changer in urban planning. This paper critically explores the role of autonomous (driverless) vehicles in plans for urban futures. By looking into the urban plans of 10 European capitals, we investigate the anticipated promises and hazards of autonomous vehicles. Theoretically, the paper draws upon critical urban mobilities studies that invite interlinking carbon reduction, smart cities and mobility planning. By examining these plans, the paper critically evaluates current urban planning for autonomous vehicles by asking whether one can identify any links to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals of sustainable cities and communities. A practice-based view on automation is then suggested as a pathway to promote a thorough sustainable mobility transition. It is concluded that none of the plans of the 10 capitals studied require AVs to integrate with public means of transport or to be fuelled by renewable energy sources. Hence, AVs are likely to individualise and intensify the existing automobility regime further and emissions are likely to increase, according to the comparative urban analysis. We therefore conclude that urban policy-making needs to contest the existing techno-centric conception of autonomous vehicles if these are to support the sustainable development goals of cities. •Urban governance of AV mainly displays recrafting policy framings, though sequencing is also identified.•Comparative document analysis of AV governance across cities using new mobility planning as methodological framework.•Urban governance of AV integrated with MaaS and public transportation best accommodate SDG 11 on cities.•Urban governance of AV should favour soft mobility over cars whether automated or not according to planning documents.
ISSN:0264-2751
1873-6084
DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103504