Underground pipeline explosions and housing prices: Quasi-experimental evidence from an urban city

Prior research suggests that underground pipelines do not affect housing prices or that their adverse effects decrease over time. This paper examines an interesting case study where underground pipeline explosions cause negative effects that may persist over longer periods of time. Using an administ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2021-12, Vol.111, p.105782, Article 105782
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Brian, Wang, Szu-Yung, Lin, Tzu-Chin, Chang, Hung-Hao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Prior research suggests that underground pipelines do not affect housing prices or that their adverse effects decrease over time. This paper examines an interesting case study where underground pipeline explosions cause negative effects that may persist over longer periods of time. Using an administrative population-based sample of housing transaction records in Taiwan, we estimate the effect of an underground pipeline explosion on housing prices in the island’s second-largest urban city. Overall, the underground pipeline explosion reduced housing prices by 2.9% in the following nine months after the explosion. The explosion directly decreased housing prices by 3.4% during the cleanup period (the first three months after the explosion). However, housing prices directly decreased by 4.9% during the recovery period (the fourth to ninth months after the explosion). We identify migration across districts as a potential mechanism responsible for the explosion’s effect on equilibrium housing prices. •We assess the impact of an underground pipeline explosion on house prices.•The difference-in-differences model is estimated.•The explosion decreases house prices around the explosion site.•Migration out of disaster areas can be viewed as a self-insured strategy.
ISSN:0264-8377
1873-5754
DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105782