Biodiesel production through non-conventional supercritical routes: Process simulation and technical evaluation

•Three non-conventional supercritical biodiesel production processes are simulated.•Triacetin and glycerol dicarbonate are produced as by-products instead of glycerol.•Route 1 proved feasible in every scenario and is the less energy intensive route.•Route 2 demands 3–4 times more energy and was not...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management 2022-01, Vol.251, p.114998, Article 114998
Hauptverfasser: Pacheco, João R., Villardi, Hugo G.D., Cavalcante, Raquel M., Young, André F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Three non-conventional supercritical biodiesel production processes are simulated.•Triacetin and glycerol dicarbonate are produced as by-products instead of glycerol.•Route 1 proved feasible in every scenario and is the less energy intensive route.•Route 2 demands 3–4 times more energy and was not able to meet the specifications.•Route 3 is also feasible, but some care is needed in the final purification step. The conventional chemical route for biodiesel production is transesterification, which is carried out on industry via homogeneous alkaline catalysis. Although several alternative technologies have been studied to make transesterification more competitive, none of them, so far, has been interesting at commercial level. One of the drawbacks of transesterification is the generation of glycerol, which must be removed and whose excess demand makes it less profitable. Therefore, a possible solution would be to explore industrial processes that generate by-products other than glycerol, which could add value to the process. In this article, simulations of three “non-conventional” supercritical routes for industrial biodiesel production were carried out: interesterification with methyl acetate (Route 1); reaction with acetic acid followed by esterification with methanol (Route 2); and reaction with dimethyl carbonate (Route 3). As the main reactions occur at supercritical state, catalysts are not required and the purification steps are simpler than for the conventional technology. Routes 1 and 3 proved to be technically feasible. The first one consumes only 7.1–8.5% of the energy that will be produced as biofuel, while the second one consumes 8.8–10.4%. The incorporation of the by-products - triacetin and glycerol dicarbonate - in the final fuel was also evaluated and proved to be a possible alternative. Route 2, however, was not able to provide biodiesel meeting the specifications (high acidity), and demands three to four times more energy than the other routes. So, it cannot be considered technically feasible at this level and will require further development.
ISSN:0196-8904
1879-2227
DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114998