Outcome of Undergraduate Medical Education Using Medical Simulation according to Students' Feedback

Objectives : this study aimed to determine students’ overall satisfaction with clinical simulation sessions and compare the satisfaction levels of obstetrics/gynaecology (obgyn) students (group one) and internal medicine students (group two). methods : this study was conducted from January to June 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sultan Qaboos University medical journal 2020-08, Vol.20 (3), p.310-315
Hauptverfasser: Garadah , Taysir S, Gutierrez , Ruel, Jaradat , Ahmed A. K, Riaz , Salman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives : this study aimed to determine students’ overall satisfaction with clinical simulation sessions and compare the satisfaction levels of obstetrics/gynaecology (obgyn) students (group one) and internal medicine students (group two). methods : this study was conducted from January to June 2019 at the Arabian gulf university, Manama, Bahrain. students from year five were included and offered sessions that used simulations to support clinical skill development. data were collected using a five-point Likert scale (i.e. strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) via feedback forms. results : a total of 150 students were included in this study(response rate: 99.07%). in groups of seven, the students attended five cycles of simulations with two sessions per cycle in each specialty over six months. the mean percentage of responses of “strongly agree” and “agree” was 97.8± 2.3% in group one and 95.7 ± 2.7% in group two. the satisfaction scores of group one were higher than those from group two for all statements. significant differences were found between groups one and two in their responses to the statement of whether the simulation session was relevant to clinical practice (100% versus 92.9%; p
ISSN:2075-051X
2075-0528
DOI:10.18295/squmj.2020.20.03.010