Clinical implications of local impedance measurement using the IntellaNav MiFi OI ablation catheter: an ex vivo study

Purpose Clinical implication of local impedance (LI) for radiofrequency (RF) ablation has not been fully established. This study aimed to investigate this point using IntellaNav MiFi OI TM catheter. Methods LI and generator impedance drops (ΔLI and ΔGI) were evaluated in excised porcine hearts ( N =...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2022-01, Vol.63 (1), p.185-195
Hauptverfasser: Iwakawa, Hidehiro, Takigawa, Masateru, Goya, Masahiko, Iwata, Toyoto, Martin, Claire A., Anzai, Tatsuhiko, Takahashi, Kunihiko, Amemiya, Miki, Yamamoto, Tasuku, Sekigawa, Masahiro, Shirai, Yasuhiro, Tao, Susumu, Hayashi, Tatsuya, Takahashi, Yoshihide, Watanabe, Hiroyuki, Sasano, Tetsuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Clinical implication of local impedance (LI) for radiofrequency (RF) ablation has not been fully established. This study aimed to investigate this point using IntellaNav MiFi OI TM catheter. Methods LI and generator impedance drops (ΔLI and ΔGI) were evaluated in excised porcine hearts ( N = 16) during RF applications at a range of powers (30 and 50 W), contact forces (5–40 g), and durations (10–180 s) using perpendicular or parallel catheter orientation. Additionally, temporal LI changes were assessed. Results Of the 240 lesions without steam pops (92.3%), ΔLI showed better correlations with lesion surface area ( ρ  = 0.55 vs 0.36,  P = 0.004), maximum depth ( ρ = 0.53 vs 0.14,  P < 0.001), and lesion volume ( ρ = 0.64 vs 0.23,  P < 0.001) than ΔGI. Furthermore, %LI-drop (ΔLI/initial LI) demonstrated stronger correlations with lesion surface area ( ρ = 0.60 vs 0.55, P < 0.001), maximum depth ( ρ = 0.57 vs 0.53, P < 0.001), and volume ( ρ = 0.69 vs 0.64, P < 0.001) than ΔLI. Parallel catheter orientation improved correlation of ΔLI with lesion surface area ( ρ = 0.63 vs 0.40,  P = 0.015) and depth ( ρ = 0.68 vs 0.45,  P = 0.008) and created a larger surface lesion (36.3[29.2–42.7] mm 2 vs 28.8[21.6–34.2] mm 2 , P < 0.001) than the perpendicular. LI of the lesions significantly differed between baseline, immediately after RF, and 5 min after ( P < 0.01). LI reaching plateau, larger initial LI, ΔLI, and %LI-drop, and larger RF power and longer duration were observed in pop lesions ( P < 0.05). Conclusions %LI-drop demonstrated a better correlation with lesion size than ΔLI. LI may be used as an additional parameter to predict lesion size and steam pops. Temporal variation and catheter orientation should be considered to interpret LI.
ISSN:1383-875X
1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-021-00954-8