Certification effect of R&D subsidies on debt financing: do institutional forces matter?
This study extends the extant literature on the direct outcome additionality of R&D subsidies by investigating whether R&D subsidies can have an indirect certification effect. Based on the panel data of Chinese listed firms, we argue that in emerging economies, such as China, obtaining R&...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | R & D management 2021-11, Vol.51 (5), p.538-550 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study extends the extant literature on the direct outcome additionality of R&D subsidies by investigating whether R&D subsidies can have an indirect certification effect. Based on the panel data of Chinese listed firms, we argue that in emerging economies, such as China, obtaining R&D subsidies can serve as a quality signal of firms’ R&D projects to banks, thereby allowing firms to attract more bank loans. Specifically, 1% increase in R&D subsidies can increase firms’ access to bank loans by 0.06%. In addition, by using the lens of institutional contingency, we further examine the effect of institutional forces on the signal‐conveying mechanism of R&D subsidies. The results show that firm‐level state ownership weakens the positive signal effect of R&D subsidies, whereas region‐ and industry‐level institutional forces strengthen the positive signal effect. Our study has important implications for policy makers and firms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-6807 1467-9310 |
DOI: | 10.1111/radm.12465 |