Lifetime Health and Economic Outcomes of Active Surveillance, Radical Prostatectomy, and Radiotherapy for Favorable-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer

To estimate the lifetime health and economic outcomes of selecting active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP), or radiation therapy (RT) as initial management for low- or favorable-risk localized prostate cancer. A discrete-event simulation model was developed using evidence from published...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2021-12, Vol.24 (12), p.1737-1745
Hauptverfasser: Degeling, Koen, Corcoran, Niall M., Pereira-Salgado, Amanda, Hamid, Anis A., Siva, Shankar, IJzerman, Maarten J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To estimate the lifetime health and economic outcomes of selecting active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP), or radiation therapy (RT) as initial management for low- or favorable-risk localized prostate cancer. A discrete-event simulation model was developed using evidence from published randomized trials. Health outcomes were measured in life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were included from a public payer perspective in Australian dollars. Outcomes were discounted at 5% over a lifetime horizon. Probabilistic and scenario analyses quantified parameter and structural uncertainty. A total of 60% of patients in the AS arm eventually received radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) compared with 90% for RP and 91% for RT. Although AS resulted in fewer treatment-related complications, it led to increased clinical progression (AS 40.7%, RP 17.6%, RT 19.9%) and metastatic disease (AS 13.4%, RP 6.1%, RT 7.0%). QALYs were 10.88 for AS, 11.10 for RP, and 11.13 for RT. Total costs were A$17 912 for AS, A$15 609 for RP, and A$15 118 for RT. At a willingness to pay of A$20 000/QALY, RT had a 61.4% chance of being cost-effective compared to 38.5% for RP and 0.1% for AS. Although AS resulted in fewer and delayed treatment-related complications, it was not found to be a cost-effective strategy for favorable-risk localized prostate cancer over a lifetime horizon because of an increase in the number of patients developing metastatic disease. RT was the dominant strategy yielding higher QALYs at lower cost although differences compared with RP were small. •Active surveillance (AS) is an initial management strategy for low- and favorable-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but estimates of the long-term health and economic consequences of avoiding or delaying radical treatment have been subject to structural and parameter uncertainty because even cost-effectiveness studies based on trials with a 10-year follow up have proven that it is challenging to appropriately model future clinical events, such as development of metastatic disease and cancer deaths, using cohort-level modeling approaches.•By synthesizing evidence from multiple randomized trials in an individual-level health economic simulation model using sophisticated survival analysis methods, this study showed that short-term health economic benefits from avoiding or delaying radical treatment through an initial AS strategy were negated in the long-term because of an increase in clinical
ISSN:1098-3015
1524-4733
DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2021.06.004