Estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration with limited climatic data using machine learning approaches across different climate zones in New Mexico

Reference evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) is a major factor for water resource management. Although the FAO Penman–Monteith model is the highly recommended for estimating ET 0 , its requirement of a complete climatic variables has made the application of this model complicated. The objective of this stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theoretical and applied climatology 2022, Vol.147 (1-2), p.575-587
Hauptverfasser: Mokari, Esmaiil, DuBois, David, Samani, Zohrab, Mohebzadeh, Hamid, Djaman, Koffi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reference evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) is a major factor for water resource management. Although the FAO Penman–Monteith model is the highly recommended for estimating ET 0 , its requirement of a complete climatic variables has made the application of this model complicated. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of four machine learning (ML) models, namely extreme learning machine (ELM), genetic programming (GP), random forest (RF), and support vector regression (SVR), for estimating daily ET 0 with limited climatic data using a tenfold cross-validation method across different climate zones in New Mexico. Four input scenarios, namely S1 ( T max (maximum air temperature), T min (minimum air temperature), RH ave (average relative humidity), U 2 (wind speed at 2 m height), R S (total solar radiation)), S2 ( T max , T min , U 2 , R S ), S3 ( T max , T min , R S ), and S4 ( T ave , R S ), were considered using climatic data during the 2009–2019 period from six selected weather stations across different climate zones. The results showed that the estimated daily ET 0 differed significantly following ML model types and input scenarios across different climate zones. The ML models under S1 scenario showed the best estimation accuracy during the testing stage in climate zones 1 and 5 (RMSE and MAE 
ISSN:0177-798X
1434-4483
DOI:10.1007/s00704-021-03855-y