Elections with Multiple Positive and Negative Votes
We investigate the performance of a voting procedure in which voters cast multiple votes, with some votes positive and some negative. The procedure is a variant of the “D21” method proposed by Janeček (2016). The setting is the 2018 Czech Republic presidential election. Evidence is provided through...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Homo oeconomicus 2021-12, Vol.38 (1-4), p.37-47 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 47 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-4 |
| container_start_page | 37 |
| container_title | Homo oeconomicus |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Gibbs, Tanya Chappell, Jr, Henry W. |
| description | We investigate the performance of a voting procedure in which voters cast multiple votes, with some votes positive and some negative. The procedure is a variant of the “D21” method proposed by Janeček (2016). The setting is the 2018 Czech Republic presidential election. Evidence is provided through a survey of secondary school students asked to cast ballots in both single- and multi-vote election experiments. Using the survey data, we estimate a spatial voting model to uncover ideological positions of candidates and respondents. Results suggest that the multi-vote procedure may limit the success of extreme candidates in elections. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41412-021-00109-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2611829275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2611829275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-76980a2ccfc05ff0fa15f88a6a91070b361e223ea3d33b64368321a29b84a22d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQxxdRsNR-AU8Bz6szO8k-jlKqFurjoF6X7Xa3psSkZlPFb29shN6cyzDM_wE_xs4RLhFAXaUccxQcBHIABMPhiI0EScklSjxmIzA5cUANp2yS0gb6KZQxBCNGsyr4rmzqlH2V3Vt2v6u6cluF7KlJZVd-hszVq-whrN3-eG26kM7YSXRVCpO_PWYvN7Pn6R1fPN7Op9cL7olMx5U0GpzwPnooYoTosIhaO-kMgoIlSQxCUHC0IlrKnKQmgU6Ypc6dECsas4shd9s2H7uQOrtpdm3dV1ohEbUwQhW9Sgwq3zYptSHabVu-u_bbIthfPnbgY3s-ds_HQm_KBlPwTV2mg0XpIjdARvUSGiSpf9br0B7a_wn-AW2icEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2611829275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elections with Multiple Positive and Negative Votes</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gibbs, Tanya ; Chappell, Jr, Henry W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, Tanya ; Chappell, Jr, Henry W.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate the performance of a voting procedure in which voters cast multiple votes, with some votes positive and some negative. The procedure is a variant of the “D21” method proposed by Janeček (2016). The setting is the 2018 Czech Republic presidential election. Evidence is provided through a survey of secondary school students asked to cast ballots in both single- and multi-vote election experiments. Using the survey data, we estimate a spatial voting model to uncover ideological positions of candidates and respondents. Results suggest that the multi-vote procedure may limit the success of extreme candidates in elections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0943-0180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-6161</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41412-021-00109-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Ballots ; Behavioral/Experimental Economics ; Candidates ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Elections ; Experiments ; Game Theory ; Institutional/Evolutionary Economics ; International Political Economy ; Law and Economics ; Polls & surveys ; Presidential elections ; Research Paper ; Respondents ; Secondary school students ; Secondary schools ; Social Choice/Welfare Economics/Public Choice/Political Economy ; Voters ; Voting ; Voting machines</subject><ispartof>Homo oeconomicus, 2021-12, Vol.38 (1-4), p.37-47</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-76980a2ccfc05ff0fa15f88a6a91070b361e223ea3d33b64368321a29b84a22d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-76980a2ccfc05ff0fa15f88a6a91070b361e223ea3d33b64368321a29b84a22d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2319-6862</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41412-021-00109-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41412-021-00109-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chappell, Jr, Henry W.</creatorcontrib><title>Elections with Multiple Positive and Negative Votes</title><title>Homo oeconomicus</title><addtitle>Homo Oecon</addtitle><description>We investigate the performance of a voting procedure in which voters cast multiple votes, with some votes positive and some negative. The procedure is a variant of the “D21” method proposed by Janeček (2016). The setting is the 2018 Czech Republic presidential election. Evidence is provided through a survey of secondary school students asked to cast ballots in both single- and multi-vote election experiments. Using the survey data, we estimate a spatial voting model to uncover ideological positions of candidates and respondents. Results suggest that the multi-vote procedure may limit the success of extreme candidates in elections.</description><subject>Ballots</subject><subject>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Institutional/Evolutionary Economics</subject><subject>International Political Economy</subject><subject>Law and Economics</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Social Choice/Welfare Economics/Public Choice/Political Economy</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting machines</subject><issn>0943-0180</issn><issn>2366-6161</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQxxdRsNR-AU8Bz6szO8k-jlKqFurjoF6X7Xa3psSkZlPFb29shN6cyzDM_wE_xs4RLhFAXaUccxQcBHIABMPhiI0EScklSjxmIzA5cUANp2yS0gb6KZQxBCNGsyr4rmzqlH2V3Vt2v6u6cluF7KlJZVd-hszVq-whrN3-eG26kM7YSXRVCpO_PWYvN7Pn6R1fPN7Op9cL7olMx5U0GpzwPnooYoTosIhaO-kMgoIlSQxCUHC0IlrKnKQmgU6Ypc6dECsas4shd9s2H7uQOrtpdm3dV1ohEbUwQhW9Sgwq3zYptSHabVu-u_bbIthfPnbgY3s-ds_HQm_KBlPwTV2mg0XpIjdARvUSGiSpf9br0B7a_wn-AW2icEE</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Gibbs, Tanya</creator><creator>Chappell, Jr, Henry W.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2319-6862</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Elections with Multiple Positive and Negative Votes</title><author>Gibbs, Tanya ; Chappell, Jr, Henry W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-76980a2ccfc05ff0fa15f88a6a91070b361e223ea3d33b64368321a29b84a22d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ballots</topic><topic>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Institutional/Evolutionary Economics</topic><topic>International Political Economy</topic><topic>Law and Economics</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Social Choice/Welfare Economics/Public Choice/Political Economy</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting machines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chappell, Jr, Henry W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Homo oeconomicus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibbs, Tanya</au><au>Chappell, Jr, Henry W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elections with Multiple Positive and Negative Votes</atitle><jtitle>Homo oeconomicus</jtitle><stitle>Homo Oecon</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>37-47</pages><issn>0943-0180</issn><eissn>2366-6161</eissn><abstract>We investigate the performance of a voting procedure in which voters cast multiple votes, with some votes positive and some negative. The procedure is a variant of the “D21” method proposed by Janeček (2016). The setting is the 2018 Czech Republic presidential election. Evidence is provided through a survey of secondary school students asked to cast ballots in both single- and multi-vote election experiments. Using the survey data, we estimate a spatial voting model to uncover ideological positions of candidates and respondents. Results suggest that the multi-vote procedure may limit the success of extreme candidates in elections.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s41412-021-00109-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2319-6862</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0943-0180 |
| ispartof | Homo oeconomicus, 2021-12, Vol.38 (1-4), p.37-47 |
| issn | 0943-0180 2366-6161 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2611829275 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Ballots Behavioral/Experimental Economics Candidates Economics Economics and Finance Elections Experiments Game Theory Institutional/Evolutionary Economics International Political Economy Law and Economics Polls & surveys Presidential elections Research Paper Respondents Secondary school students Secondary schools Social Choice/Welfare Economics/Public Choice/Political Economy Voters Voting Voting machines |
| title | Elections with Multiple Positive and Negative Votes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A23%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elections%20with%20Multiple%20Positive%20and%20Negative%20Votes&rft.jtitle=Homo%20oeconomicus&rft.au=Gibbs,%20Tanya&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=37-47&rft.issn=0943-0180&rft.eissn=2366-6161&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41412-021-00109-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2611829275%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2611829275&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |