Leased Equipment: When Does a Permanent Establishment Exist?
As in most cross-border commercial transactions, the tax position of a lessor that is resident in one country but leases equipment to a lessee in another country will depend on whether the lessor has a permanent establishment in the latter through which the lessor's business is being carried on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian tax journal 2002-03, Vol.50 (2), p.489-523 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | As in most cross-border commercial transactions, the tax position of a lessor that is resident in one country but leases equipment to a lessee in another country will depend on whether the lessor has a permanent establishment in the latter through which the lessor's business is being carried on. A large number of OECD countries have reserved the right to tax equipment rentals as if they were royalties. Where that is the case, the absence of a permanent establishment in the source country will result in the rental income being subject to a withholding tax on the gross rental revenue, rather than to income tax that would otherwise be levied at normal rates on the net amount of income attributable to a permanent establishment. This article examines the current state of the law in respect of the requirements for the existence of a permanent establishment, with specific reference to the relevant issues relating to cross-border operational lease arrangements, and it reviews the ways in which these requirements are gradually changing. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-5111 |