The effect of flanking element length in thermal bridge calculation and possible simplifications to account for combined thermal bridges in well insulated building envelopes

A well-insulated, airtight, thermal bridge free building envelope is a key factor for nearly zero energy buildings (nZEB). However, increased insulation thickness and minimised air leakages increase the effect of thermal bridges on the overall energy efficiency of the nZEBs. Currently, the calculati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy and buildings 2021-12, Vol.252, p.111397, Article 111397
Hauptverfasser: Hallik, Jaanus, Kalamees, Targo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 111397
container_title Energy and buildings
container_volume 252
creator Hallik, Jaanus
Kalamees, Targo
description A well-insulated, airtight, thermal bridge free building envelope is a key factor for nearly zero energy buildings (nZEB). However, increased insulation thickness and minimised air leakages increase the effect of thermal bridges on the overall energy efficiency of the nZEBs. Currently, the calculation of linear thermal transmittance follows ISO 10211, which requires the separate numerical assessment of combined thermal bridges, where two or more junctions are positioned in close proximity within delimiting cut-off planes. This poses a practical problem, as the number of different combinations (mainly related to window to wall connections in combination with corners, intermediate ceiling etc) is too large in practice to follow the standard procedure. In this study, a parametric numerical assessment of different thermal bridges in well-insulated constructions showed that with linear thermal transmittance up to 0.2 W/(mK) in lightweight construction and up to 0.1 W/(mK) in heavyweight construction the reduction of flanking element length from 1.440 m to 0.288 m (80% reduction) had no effect on numerically calculated linear thermal transmittance in steady-state conditions. For thermal bridges inside heavyweight construction with linear thermal transmittance below 1.1 W/(mK) the flanking element length could be reduced by 50% without any effect and by 70% with marginal effect (
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111397
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2606202231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378778821006812</els_id><sourcerecordid>2606202231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-19924430f90b45ac53e58f94186e45ad50499140e444e3849a58d00a577bef2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQhi0EEgvlEZAscc7WTpzYOaEKtRRpJS7bs-U4410vjp3aCVUfinfE2eXEhdNoNP_8498fQreUrCmhzffDGnw3W9evS1LSNaW0avkZWlHBy6KhXJyjFam4KDgX4hJdpXQghDQ1pyv0tt0DBmNATzgYbJzyL9bvMDgYwE_Ygd9Ne2w9nvYQB-VwF22_A6yV07NTkw0eK9_jMaRkOwc42WF01lh9nCU8Bay0DnM2MyFiHYbOeug_-aXlxD9wLte0-GbFMdPxMf4VXBghfUMXRrkENx_1Gv359XP78LvYPD8-PfzYFLps-FTQti0Zq4hpScdqpesKamFaRkUDue9rwtqWMgKMMagEa1UtekJUzXkHpoTqGt2dfMcY_s6QJnkIc_T5pCwb0uRvLiuaVfVJpWMOH8HIMdpBxf-SErmQkQf5QUYuZOSJTN67P-1BjvBqIcqkLXgNvY2Zg-yD_cLhHVLxnRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2606202231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of flanking element length in thermal bridge calculation and possible simplifications to account for combined thermal bridges in well insulated building envelopes</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hallik, Jaanus ; Kalamees, Targo</creator><creatorcontrib>Hallik, Jaanus ; Kalamees, Targo</creatorcontrib><description>A well-insulated, airtight, thermal bridge free building envelope is a key factor for nearly zero energy buildings (nZEB). However, increased insulation thickness and minimised air leakages increase the effect of thermal bridges on the overall energy efficiency of the nZEBs. Currently, the calculation of linear thermal transmittance follows ISO 10211, which requires the separate numerical assessment of combined thermal bridges, where two or more junctions are positioned in close proximity within delimiting cut-off planes. This poses a practical problem, as the number of different combinations (mainly related to window to wall connections in combination with corners, intermediate ceiling etc) is too large in practice to follow the standard procedure. In this study, a parametric numerical assessment of different thermal bridges in well-insulated constructions showed that with linear thermal transmittance up to 0.2 W/(mK) in lightweight construction and up to 0.1 W/(mK) in heavyweight construction the reduction of flanking element length from 1.440 m to 0.288 m (80% reduction) had no effect on numerically calculated linear thermal transmittance in steady-state conditions. For thermal bridges inside heavyweight construction with linear thermal transmittance below 1.1 W/(mK) the flanking element length could be reduced by 50% without any effect and by 70% with marginal effect (&lt;2%) on linear thermal transmittance. The shorter flanking element length, roughly equal to its thickness, can then be used to minimise the amount of combined thermal bridges in complex building envelopes. Compared to ISO 10211 requirements, the amount of different combined thermal bridges in two exemplary building envelopes was reduced by 35% to 76%, depending on the building type, and allowed deviation of 0.5%, 1.0% or 2.0%, thus significantly reducing the working hours of practitioners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6178</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Air leakage ; Airtightness ; Building envelopes ; Ceilings ; Combined thermal bridge ; Construction ; Energy efficiency ; Envelopes ; Flanking element length ; Green buildings ; Insulation ; Linear thermal transmittance ; Mathematical analysis ; Reduction ; Thermal bridges ; Thickness ; Transmittance ; Working hours</subject><ispartof>Energy and buildings, 2021-12, Vol.252, p.111397, Article 111397</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-19924430f90b45ac53e58f94186e45ad50499140e444e3849a58d00a577bef2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-19924430f90b45ac53e58f94186e45ad50499140e444e3849a58d00a577bef2e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8850-7943</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111397$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hallik, Jaanus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalamees, Targo</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of flanking element length in thermal bridge calculation and possible simplifications to account for combined thermal bridges in well insulated building envelopes</title><title>Energy and buildings</title><description>A well-insulated, airtight, thermal bridge free building envelope is a key factor for nearly zero energy buildings (nZEB). However, increased insulation thickness and minimised air leakages increase the effect of thermal bridges on the overall energy efficiency of the nZEBs. Currently, the calculation of linear thermal transmittance follows ISO 10211, which requires the separate numerical assessment of combined thermal bridges, where two or more junctions are positioned in close proximity within delimiting cut-off planes. This poses a practical problem, as the number of different combinations (mainly related to window to wall connections in combination with corners, intermediate ceiling etc) is too large in practice to follow the standard procedure. In this study, a parametric numerical assessment of different thermal bridges in well-insulated constructions showed that with linear thermal transmittance up to 0.2 W/(mK) in lightweight construction and up to 0.1 W/(mK) in heavyweight construction the reduction of flanking element length from 1.440 m to 0.288 m (80% reduction) had no effect on numerically calculated linear thermal transmittance in steady-state conditions. For thermal bridges inside heavyweight construction with linear thermal transmittance below 1.1 W/(mK) the flanking element length could be reduced by 50% without any effect and by 70% with marginal effect (&lt;2%) on linear thermal transmittance. The shorter flanking element length, roughly equal to its thickness, can then be used to minimise the amount of combined thermal bridges in complex building envelopes. Compared to ISO 10211 requirements, the amount of different combined thermal bridges in two exemplary building envelopes was reduced by 35% to 76%, depending on the building type, and allowed deviation of 0.5%, 1.0% or 2.0%, thus significantly reducing the working hours of practitioners.</description><subject>Air leakage</subject><subject>Airtightness</subject><subject>Building envelopes</subject><subject>Ceilings</subject><subject>Combined thermal bridge</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Envelopes</subject><subject>Flanking element length</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Insulation</subject><subject>Linear thermal transmittance</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Thermal bridges</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Transmittance</subject><subject>Working hours</subject><issn>0378-7788</issn><issn>1872-6178</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQhi0EEgvlEZAscc7WTpzYOaEKtRRpJS7bs-U4410vjp3aCVUfinfE2eXEhdNoNP_8498fQreUrCmhzffDGnw3W9evS1LSNaW0avkZWlHBy6KhXJyjFam4KDgX4hJdpXQghDQ1pyv0tt0DBmNATzgYbJzyL9bvMDgYwE_Ygd9Ne2w9nvYQB-VwF22_A6yV07NTkw0eK9_jMaRkOwc42WF01lh9nCU8Bay0DnM2MyFiHYbOeug_-aXlxD9wLte0-GbFMdPxMf4VXBghfUMXRrkENx_1Gv359XP78LvYPD8-PfzYFLps-FTQti0Zq4hpScdqpesKamFaRkUDue9rwtqWMgKMMagEa1UtekJUzXkHpoTqGt2dfMcY_s6QJnkIc_T5pCwb0uRvLiuaVfVJpWMOH8HIMdpBxf-SErmQkQf5QUYuZOSJTN67P-1BjvBqIcqkLXgNvY2Zg-yD_cLhHVLxnRw</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Hallik, Jaanus</creator><creator>Kalamees, Targo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-7943</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>The effect of flanking element length in thermal bridge calculation and possible simplifications to account for combined thermal bridges in well insulated building envelopes</title><author>Hallik, Jaanus ; Kalamees, Targo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-19924430f90b45ac53e58f94186e45ad50499140e444e3849a58d00a577bef2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air leakage</topic><topic>Airtightness</topic><topic>Building envelopes</topic><topic>Ceilings</topic><topic>Combined thermal bridge</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Envelopes</topic><topic>Flanking element length</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Insulation</topic><topic>Linear thermal transmittance</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Thermal bridges</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Transmittance</topic><topic>Working hours</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hallik, Jaanus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalamees, Targo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hallik, Jaanus</au><au>Kalamees, Targo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of flanking element length in thermal bridge calculation and possible simplifications to account for combined thermal bridges in well insulated building envelopes</atitle><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>252</volume><spage>111397</spage><pages>111397-</pages><artnum>111397</artnum><issn>0378-7788</issn><eissn>1872-6178</eissn><abstract>A well-insulated, airtight, thermal bridge free building envelope is a key factor for nearly zero energy buildings (nZEB). However, increased insulation thickness and minimised air leakages increase the effect of thermal bridges on the overall energy efficiency of the nZEBs. Currently, the calculation of linear thermal transmittance follows ISO 10211, which requires the separate numerical assessment of combined thermal bridges, where two or more junctions are positioned in close proximity within delimiting cut-off planes. This poses a practical problem, as the number of different combinations (mainly related to window to wall connections in combination with corners, intermediate ceiling etc) is too large in practice to follow the standard procedure. In this study, a parametric numerical assessment of different thermal bridges in well-insulated constructions showed that with linear thermal transmittance up to 0.2 W/(mK) in lightweight construction and up to 0.1 W/(mK) in heavyweight construction the reduction of flanking element length from 1.440 m to 0.288 m (80% reduction) had no effect on numerically calculated linear thermal transmittance in steady-state conditions. For thermal bridges inside heavyweight construction with linear thermal transmittance below 1.1 W/(mK) the flanking element length could be reduced by 50% without any effect and by 70% with marginal effect (&lt;2%) on linear thermal transmittance. The shorter flanking element length, roughly equal to its thickness, can then be used to minimise the amount of combined thermal bridges in complex building envelopes. Compared to ISO 10211 requirements, the amount of different combined thermal bridges in two exemplary building envelopes was reduced by 35% to 76%, depending on the building type, and allowed deviation of 0.5%, 1.0% or 2.0%, thus significantly reducing the working hours of practitioners.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111397</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-7943</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-7788
ispartof Energy and buildings, 2021-12, Vol.252, p.111397, Article 111397
issn 0378-7788
1872-6178
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2606202231
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Air leakage
Airtightness
Building envelopes
Ceilings
Combined thermal bridge
Construction
Energy efficiency
Envelopes
Flanking element length
Green buildings
Insulation
Linear thermal transmittance
Mathematical analysis
Reduction
Thermal bridges
Thickness
Transmittance
Working hours
title The effect of flanking element length in thermal bridge calculation and possible simplifications to account for combined thermal bridges in well insulated building envelopes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A31%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20flanking%20element%20length%20in%20thermal%20bridge%20calculation%20and%20possible%20simplifications%20to%20account%20for%20combined%20thermal%20bridges%20in%20well%20insulated%20building%20envelopes&rft.jtitle=Energy%20and%20buildings&rft.au=Hallik,%20Jaanus&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=252&rft.spage=111397&rft.pages=111397-&rft.artnum=111397&rft.issn=0378-7788&rft.eissn=1872-6178&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111397&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2606202231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2606202231&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378778821006812&rfr_iscdi=true