Loss aversion in taste-based employee discrimination: Evidence from a choice experiment
Using a choice experiment, we test whether taste-based employee discrimination against ethnic minorities is susceptible to loss aversion. In line with empirical evidence from previous research, our results indicate that introducing a hypothetical wage penalty for discriminatory choice behaviour lowe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economics letters 2021-11, Vol.208, p.110081, Article 110081 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Using a choice experiment, we test whether taste-based employee discrimination against ethnic minorities is susceptible to loss aversion. In line with empirical evidence from previous research, our results indicate that introducing a hypothetical wage penalty for discriminatory choice behaviour lowers discrimination and that higher penalties have a greater effect. Most notably, we find that the propensity to discriminate is significantly lower when this penalty is loss-framed rather than gain-framed. From a policy perspective, it could therefore be more effective to financially penalise taste-based discriminators than to incentivise them not to discriminate.
•Participant preferences reveal ethnic, taste-based employee discrimination.•Preferences reverse when a wage penalty for discriminatory behaviour is introduced.•The propensity to discriminate is lower when the penalty is loss- vs. gain-framed.•Penalising said discrimination is more effective than rewarding non-discrimination. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-1765 1873-7374 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110081 |