Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Procrastination Scale in Chinese: A Comprehensive Qualitative and Quantitative Investigation
Procrastination is a complicated phenomenon with many thoughts, behaviors, and feelings that may characterize different subgroups of procrastinators. Such phenomenon has not been well studied in an integrated theoretical framework. This study aims to establish a theory about the behavioral, cognitiv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment 2022-09, Vol.38 (5), p.412-426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Procrastination is a complicated phenomenon with many
thoughts, behaviors, and feelings that may characterize different subgroups of
procrastinators. Such phenomenon has not been well studied in an integrated
theoretical framework. This study aims to establish a theory about the
behavioral, cognitive, and affective aspects of procrastination and to develop
and validate an operational instrument. In Study 1, we conducted qualitative
research based on grounded theories and generated seven initial categories with
22 themes associated with the components in procrastination. In Study 2, we
developed an instrument, the Multidimensional Procrastination Scale (MPS), and
established a five-dimension structure for the MPS using explanatory factor
analysis (EFA; N = 435) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA;
N = 387). In Study 3, we established construct validity and
predictive validity for the MPS by building a nomological framework and
predicting behavioral procrastination, respectively. The theoretical framework
of procrastination included maladaptive (i.e., impulsive and unorganized,
hesitation, lack of incentives, avoidance) and adaptive (i.e., arousal and
rationalization) components. The MPS demonstrated acceptable reliability,
factorial validity, construct validity, and predictive validity. The findings of
this study have implications for further studies on the typology of
procrastination and the development of tailored interventions to alleviate
maladaptive aspects of procrastination. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1015-5759 2151-2426 |
DOI: | 10.1027/1015-5759/a000675 |