Sociology versus economics: Economic life as social fact and social struggle

This review essay critically engages with recent works by Mark Granovetter, an American sociologist whose articles about social networks are among the most cited in the history of the discipline, and Thomas Piketty, a French economist whose early, illustrious career turned to worldwide public recogn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Sociology 2021-09, Vol.36 (5), p.720-731
1. Verfasser: Coburn, Elaine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 731
container_issue 5
container_start_page 720
container_title International Sociology
container_volume 36
creator Coburn, Elaine
description This review essay critically engages with recent works by Mark Granovetter, an American sociologist whose articles about social networks are among the most cited in the history of the discipline, and Thomas Piketty, a French economist whose early, illustrious career turned to worldwide public recognition with the publication of le Capital au XXieme siècle in 2015. The contrast is therefore between a well-known sociologist, one of the foremost scholars in economic sociology in the English language, and an economist of international renown who has challenged mainstream economics with his research on economic inequality and his call for participatory public involvement in economic decision-making. Both insist on the economic as social, but in distinctive ways. In this essay, first, I consider Granovetter’s long-awaited Society and Economy: Framework and Principles and Piketty’s recent Capital et idéologie, a follow-up to his earlier, best-selling book, on their own terms. Second, I think through how each scholar might understand and critique the other, pointing to complementarities and important differences in their approaches. I conclude that although both Granovetter and Piketty challenge mainstream economistic accounts of economic life, while emphasizing human agency and so the contingency of given economic relationships, they differ significantly in their respective analytical and political-normative focus. For Granovetter, what matters is that economic life is a social fact, while for Piketty it is a social struggle.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/02685809211057474
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2605160659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02685809211057474</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2605160659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-345f3f79cb392a8b5851e356a171f8047658971e601939ba6baedbc39d6169293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_gLeA59VMPiYbb1LqBxQ8qOclmybLlm1Tk12h_71dWvEgnmaG-b334BFyDewWQOs7xrFUJTMcgCkttTwhE5AIheaSn5LJ-C9G4Jxc5LxiDFBKnJDFW3Rt7GKzo18-5SFT7-ImrluX7-n8uNKuDZ7aTPMeth0N1vXUbpY_d-7T0DSdvyRnwXbZXx3nlHw8zt9nz8Xi9ell9rAoHEfZF0KqIII2rhaG27JWpQIvFFrQEEomNarSaPDIwAhTW6ytX9ZOmCUCGm7ElNwcfLcpfg4-99UqDmmzj6w4MgXIUI0UHCiXYs7Jh2qb2rVNuwpYNZZW_Sltr7k9aLJt_K_r_4JvDZlqrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2605160659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sociology versus economics: Economic life as social fact and social struggle</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Coburn, Elaine</creator><creatorcontrib>Coburn, Elaine</creatorcontrib><description>This review essay critically engages with recent works by Mark Granovetter, an American sociologist whose articles about social networks are among the most cited in the history of the discipline, and Thomas Piketty, a French economist whose early, illustrious career turned to worldwide public recognition with the publication of le Capital au XXieme siècle in 2015. The contrast is therefore between a well-known sociologist, one of the foremost scholars in economic sociology in the English language, and an economist of international renown who has challenged mainstream economics with his research on economic inequality and his call for participatory public involvement in economic decision-making. Both insist on the economic as social, but in distinctive ways. In this essay, first, I consider Granovetter’s long-awaited Society and Economy: Framework and Principles and Piketty’s recent Capital et idéologie, a follow-up to his earlier, best-selling book, on their own terms. Second, I think through how each scholar might understand and critique the other, pointing to complementarities and important differences in their approaches. I conclude that although both Granovetter and Piketty challenge mainstream economistic accounts of economic life, while emphasizing human agency and so the contingency of given economic relationships, they differ significantly in their respective analytical and political-normative focus. For Granovetter, what matters is that economic life is a social fact, while for Piketty it is a social struggle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-5809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02685809211057474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Capital ; Citizen participation ; Decision making ; Economic inequality ; Economic life ; Economic research ; Economic sociology ; Economics ; Economists ; English language ; Granovetter, Mark ; Human agency ; Inequality ; Piketty, Thomas ; Social networks ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>International Sociology, 2021-09, Vol.36 (5), p.720-731</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-345f3f79cb392a8b5851e356a171f8047658971e601939ba6baedbc39d6169293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/02685809211057474$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02685809211057474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21819,27922,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coburn, Elaine</creatorcontrib><title>Sociology versus economics: Economic life as social fact and social struggle</title><title>International Sociology</title><description>This review essay critically engages with recent works by Mark Granovetter, an American sociologist whose articles about social networks are among the most cited in the history of the discipline, and Thomas Piketty, a French economist whose early, illustrious career turned to worldwide public recognition with the publication of le Capital au XXieme siècle in 2015. The contrast is therefore between a well-known sociologist, one of the foremost scholars in economic sociology in the English language, and an economist of international renown who has challenged mainstream economics with his research on economic inequality and his call for participatory public involvement in economic decision-making. Both insist on the economic as social, but in distinctive ways. In this essay, first, I consider Granovetter’s long-awaited Society and Economy: Framework and Principles and Piketty’s recent Capital et idéologie, a follow-up to his earlier, best-selling book, on their own terms. Second, I think through how each scholar might understand and critique the other, pointing to complementarities and important differences in their approaches. I conclude that although both Granovetter and Piketty challenge mainstream economistic accounts of economic life, while emphasizing human agency and so the contingency of given economic relationships, they differ significantly in their respective analytical and political-normative focus. For Granovetter, what matters is that economic life is a social fact, while for Piketty it is a social struggle.</description><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic inequality</subject><subject>Economic life</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Economic sociology</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Granovetter, Mark</subject><subject>Human agency</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Piketty, Thomas</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0268-5809</issn><issn>1461-7242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt_gLeA59VMPiYbb1LqBxQ8qOclmybLlm1Tk12h_71dWvEgnmaG-b334BFyDewWQOs7xrFUJTMcgCkttTwhE5AIheaSn5LJ-C9G4Jxc5LxiDFBKnJDFW3Rt7GKzo18-5SFT7-ImrluX7-n8uNKuDZ7aTPMeth0N1vXUbpY_d-7T0DSdvyRnwXbZXx3nlHw8zt9nz8Xi9ell9rAoHEfZF0KqIII2rhaG27JWpQIvFFrQEEomNarSaPDIwAhTW6ytX9ZOmCUCGm7ElNwcfLcpfg4-99UqDmmzj6w4MgXIUI0UHCiXYs7Jh2qb2rVNuwpYNZZW_Sltr7k9aLJt_K_r_4JvDZlqrQ</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Coburn, Elaine</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Sociology versus economics: Economic life as social fact and social struggle</title><author>Coburn, Elaine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-345f3f79cb392a8b5851e356a171f8047658971e601939ba6baedbc39d6169293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic inequality</topic><topic>Economic life</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Economic sociology</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Granovetter, Mark</topic><topic>Human agency</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Piketty, Thomas</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coburn, Elaine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International Sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coburn, Elaine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sociology versus economics: Economic life as social fact and social struggle</atitle><jtitle>International Sociology</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>720</spage><epage>731</epage><pages>720-731</pages><issn>0268-5809</issn><eissn>1461-7242</eissn><abstract>This review essay critically engages with recent works by Mark Granovetter, an American sociologist whose articles about social networks are among the most cited in the history of the discipline, and Thomas Piketty, a French economist whose early, illustrious career turned to worldwide public recognition with the publication of le Capital au XXieme siècle in 2015. The contrast is therefore between a well-known sociologist, one of the foremost scholars in economic sociology in the English language, and an economist of international renown who has challenged mainstream economics with his research on economic inequality and his call for participatory public involvement in economic decision-making. Both insist on the economic as social, but in distinctive ways. In this essay, first, I consider Granovetter’s long-awaited Society and Economy: Framework and Principles and Piketty’s recent Capital et idéologie, a follow-up to his earlier, best-selling book, on their own terms. Second, I think through how each scholar might understand and critique the other, pointing to complementarities and important differences in their approaches. I conclude that although both Granovetter and Piketty challenge mainstream economistic accounts of economic life, while emphasizing human agency and so the contingency of given economic relationships, they differ significantly in their respective analytical and political-normative focus. For Granovetter, what matters is that economic life is a social fact, while for Piketty it is a social struggle.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/02685809211057474</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-5809
ispartof International Sociology, 2021-09, Vol.36 (5), p.720-731
issn 0268-5809
1461-7242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2605160659
source Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Capital
Citizen participation
Decision making
Economic inequality
Economic life
Economic research
Economic sociology
Economics
Economists
English language
Granovetter, Mark
Human agency
Inequality
Piketty, Thomas
Social networks
Sociology
title Sociology versus economics: Economic life as social fact and social struggle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A19%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sociology%20versus%20economics:%20Economic%20life%20as%20social%20fact%20and%20social%20struggle&rft.jtitle=International%20Sociology&rft.au=Coburn,%20Elaine&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=720&rft.epage=731&rft.pages=720-731&rft.issn=0268-5809&rft.eissn=1461-7242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02685809211057474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605160659%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2605160659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02685809211057474&rfr_iscdi=true