SOFIA upGREAT/FIFI-LS Emission-line Observations of Betelgeuse during the Great Dimming of 2019/2020

We report NASA-DLR SOFIA upGREAT circumstellar [O i ] 63.2 μ m and [C ii ] 157.7 μ m emission profiles and FIFI-LS [O i ] 63.2 μ m, [O i ] 145.5 μ m, and [C ii ] 157.7 μ m fluxes obtained shortly after Betelgeuse’s 2019/2020 Great Dimming event. Haas et al. noted a potential correlation between the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astronomical journal 2021-12, Vol.162 (6), p.246
Hauptverfasser: Harper, Graham M., Chambers, Edward, Vacca, William D., Wiesemeyer, Helmut, Fadda, Dario, DeWitt, Curtis, Wasatonic, Richard, Richards, Anita M. S., Ryde, Nils, Fischer, Christian, Richter, Matthew J., Guinan, Edward F., Minchin, Robert, Graf, Urs U., Colditz, Sebastian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We report NASA-DLR SOFIA upGREAT circumstellar [O i ] 63.2 μ m and [C ii ] 157.7 μ m emission profiles and FIFI-LS [O i ] 63.2 μ m, [O i ] 145.5 μ m, and [C ii ] 157.7 μ m fluxes obtained shortly after Betelgeuse’s 2019/2020 Great Dimming event. Haas et al. noted a potential correlation between the [O i ] 63.2 μ m flux and V magnitude based on three Kuiper Airborne Observatory observations made with the CGS and FIFI instruments. The FIFI observation was obtained when V ≃ 0.88 and revealed a 3 σ non-detection at a quarter of the previous CGS flux measurement made when V ≃ 0.35. A potential explanation could be a change in dust-gas drag heating by circumstellar silicates caused by variations in the photospheric radiation field. SOFIA observations provide a unique test of this correlation because the V -band brightness went to its lowest value on record, V ≃ 1.61, with the SOFIA observations being made when V FIFI−LS ≃ 1.51 and V upGREAT ≃ 1.36. The upGREAT spectra show a [O i ] 63.2 μ m flux larger than previous space observatory measurements obtained when V ≃ 0.58. The profile is consistent with formation in the slower, more turbulent inner S1 outflow, while the [C ii ] 157.7 μ m profile is consistent with formation farther out in the faster S2 outflow. Modeling of dust-gas drag heating, combined with 25 yr of Wing three-filter and V photometry, reveals that it is unlikely that the S1 circumstellar envelope and [O i ] 63.2 μ m fluxes are dominated by the dust-gas drag heating and that another heating source is also active. The [O i ] 63.2 μ m profile is hard to reconcile with existing outflow velocity models.
ISSN:0004-6256
1538-3881
DOI:10.3847/1538-3881/ac19b5