Performance evaluation of lead-monoxide dosimeter with parylene coating for quality assurance of brachytherapy devices
The source position of irradiation is identified using a method that uses rulers and films for quality assurance (QA) in brachytherapy. However, this method involves a high probability of errors, because the scales are checked using the naked eye, and QA is indirectly performed using photographs. Le...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of instrumentation 2021-11, Vol.16 (11), p.P11017 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The source position of irradiation is identified using a
method that uses rulers and films for quality assurance (QA) in
brachytherapy. However, this method involves a high probability of
errors, because the scales are checked using the naked eye, and QA
is indirectly performed using photographs. Lead monoxide (PbO) is
widely used as a semiconductor dosimeter, because it is a
photoconductor that generates electrons in response to
electromagnetic waves. Moreover, PbO has excellent sensitivity to
reflected rays, owing to its high atomic number (
Z
Pb
:
82,
Z
O
: 8) and density (ρ
PbO
:
9.53 g/cm
3
). We applied PbO to a dosimeter for QA in a
brachytherapy device and attempted to increase the signal stability
with a parylene coating for performance improvement. Subsequently, a
comparative analysis was performed with a PbO dosimeter that was not
coated with parylene to determine whether the fabricated dosimeter
is applicable as a dosimeter for QA of the brachytherapy device, by
analyzing the reproducibility, linearity, percentage interval
distance (PID), and angular dependence in the
192
Ir source used
for brachytherapy. The RSD of the non-parylene PbO dosimeter was
0.85%, and the RSD of the parylene PbO dosimeter was 0.40% in the
reproducibility results. In the linearity evaluation results, the
R
2
value of the non-parylene PbO dosimeter was 0.9996, and that
of the parylene PbO dosimeter was 0.9997 In the PID evaluation
results, the difference in the intensity distribution measured
according to the distance due to the dose was attenuated at the
coated parylene in the case of the parylene PbO
dosimeter. Therefore, adjustments using correction coefficients are
required for suitable performance. In the angular dependence
evaluation results, the parylene PbO dosimeter had 3.44% less
angular dependence than the non-parylene dosimeter at an angle of
45
°
. The parylene-coated PbO dosimeter showed better
performance than the non-parylene-coated PbO dosimeter in terms of
the reproducibility, linearity, and angular dependence. Therefore,
it is considered that the parylene-coated PbO dosimeter can be
implemented for QA of brachytherapy devices. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1748-0221 1748-0221 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1748-0221/16/11/P11017 |