Controversy about goods classification: the use of terms and their definitions according to FEACN of the CU

Controversy about goods classification: the use of terms and their definitions according to FEACN of the CU

The paper considers the problematic terminological questions that arise among declarants and customs officials when classifying goods. Disadvantages of receiving a classification decision are described. The necessity to harmonize the terms “raw fat”, “speck” and “animal rendered fat” in the FEACN of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2021-10, Vol.854 (1), p.12034
Hauptverfasser: Kuznetsova, O A, Gustova, D S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Classification
Customs
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12034
container_title IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science
container_volume 854
creator Kuznetsova, O A
Gustova, D S
description The paper considers the problematic terminological questions that arise among declarants and customs officials when classifying goods. Disadvantages of receiving a classification decision are described. The necessity to harmonize the terms “raw fat”, “speck” and “animal rendered fat” in the FEACN of the CU is shown.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1755-1315/854/1/012034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2595149822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2595149822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2694-2139b0803ff680d4d8ed3b3b552874aebb3124aa54beacd6bd49095dec50b7463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQLeeDObz354N0qnwtAL3XVImnRmbk1NWmH_3tbKRBC8OoeT530DDwCXGN1glKYRTjifYYp5lHIW4Qhhgig7ApPDw_FhR8kpOAthg1CcMJpNwFvu6ta7D-PDHkrluhaundMBllsZgq1sKVvr6lvYvhrYBQNdBVvjdwHKWg9H66E2la3tgPXXsnRe23oNWwcXxTx__Er04Xx1Dk4quQ3m4ntOwWpRvOT3s-XT3UM-X85KEmdsRjDNFEoRrao4RZrp1GiqqOKcpAmTRimKCZOSM2VkqWOlWYYyrk3JkUpYTKfgauxtvHvvTGjFxnW-7r8UhGccsywlpKfikSq9C8GbSjTe7qTfC4zEIFYMzsTgT_RiBRaj2D54PQata36ai-L5FyYaXfUo-QP9p_8TKBKHHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2595149822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controversy about goods classification: the use of terms and their definitions according to FEACN of the CU</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content(OpenAccess)</source><source>IOPscience journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kuznetsova, O A ; Gustova, D S</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuznetsova, O A ; Gustova, D S</creatorcontrib><description>The paper considers the problematic terminological questions that arise among declarants and customs officials when classifying goods. Disadvantages of receiving a classification decision are described. The necessity to harmonize the terms “raw fat”, “speck” and “animal rendered fat” in the FEACN of the CU is shown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/854/1/012034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Classification ; Customs</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2021-10, Vol.854 (1), p.12034</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2694-2139b0803ff680d4d8ed3b3b552874aebb3124aa54beacd6bd49095dec50b7463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/854/1/012034/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,38849,38871,53821,53848</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuznetsova, O A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustova, D S</creatorcontrib><title>Controversy about goods classification: the use of terms and their definitions according to FEACN of the CU</title><title>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><description>The paper considers the problematic terminological questions that arise among declarants and customs officials when classifying goods. Disadvantages of receiving a classification decision are described. The necessity to harmonize the terms “raw fat”, “speck” and “animal rendered fat” in the FEACN of the CU is shown.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Customs</subject><issn>1755-1307</issn><issn>1755-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQLeeDObz354N0qnwtAL3XVImnRmbk1NWmH_3tbKRBC8OoeT530DDwCXGN1glKYRTjifYYp5lHIW4Qhhgig7ApPDw_FhR8kpOAthg1CcMJpNwFvu6ta7D-PDHkrluhaundMBllsZgq1sKVvr6lvYvhrYBQNdBVvjdwHKWg9H66E2la3tgPXXsnRe23oNWwcXxTx__Er04Xx1Dk4quQ3m4ntOwWpRvOT3s-XT3UM-X85KEmdsRjDNFEoRrao4RZrp1GiqqOKcpAmTRimKCZOSM2VkqWOlWYYyrk3JkUpYTKfgauxtvHvvTGjFxnW-7r8UhGccsywlpKfikSq9C8GbSjTe7qTfC4zEIFYMzsTgT_RiBRaj2D54PQata36ai-L5FyYaXfUo-QP9p_8TKBKHHA</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Kuznetsova, O A</creator><creator>Gustova, D S</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Controversy about goods classification: the use of terms and their definitions according to FEACN of the CU</title><author>Kuznetsova, O A ; Gustova, D S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2694-2139b0803ff680d4d8ed3b3b552874aebb3124aa54beacd6bd49095dec50b7463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Customs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuznetsova, O A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustova, D S</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuznetsova, O A</au><au>Gustova, D S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controversy about goods classification: the use of terms and their definitions according to FEACN of the CU</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>854</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12034</spage><pages>12034-</pages><issn>1755-1307</issn><eissn>1755-1315</eissn><abstract>The paper considers the problematic terminological questions that arise among declarants and customs officials when classifying goods. Disadvantages of receiving a classification decision are described. The necessity to harmonize the terms “raw fat”, “speck” and “animal rendered fat” in the FEACN of the CU is shown.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1755-1315/854/1/012034</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-1307
ispartof IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2021-10, Vol.854 (1), p.12034
issn 1755-1307
1755-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2595149822
source IOP Publishing Free Content(OpenAccess); IOPscience journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Classification
Customs
title Controversy about goods classification: the use of terms and their definitions according to FEACN of the CU
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A04%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controversy%20about%20goods%20classification:%20the%20use%20of%20terms%20and%20their%20definitions%20according%20to%20FEACN%20of%20the%20CU&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Earth%20and%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Kuznetsova,%20O%20A&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=854&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12034&rft.pages=12034-&rft.issn=1755-1307&rft.eissn=1755-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1755-1315/854/1/012034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2595149822%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2595149822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true