It’s Not Just Counting that Counts: a Reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen
Gilbert et al. argue that discussions of self-related changes in patients undergoing DBS are overblown. They show that there is little evidence that these changes occur frequently and make recommendations for further research. We point out that their framing of the issue, their methodology, and thei...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Neuroethics 2021-10, Vol.14 (Suppl 1), p.23-26 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 26 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Suppl 1 |
| container_start_page | 23 |
| container_title | Neuroethics |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Bluhm, Robyn Cabrera, Laura Y. |
| description | Gilbert et al. argue that discussions of self-related changes in patients undergoing DBS are overblown. They show that there is little evidence that these changes occur frequently and make recommendations for further research. We point out that their framing of the issue, their methodology, and their recommendations do not attend to other important questions about these changes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12152-018-9391-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2593362606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2593362606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-aff81a8d848608df96a756a109de2fb22160c729656acbc6c2d7c4f68a338d7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElOwzAUhi0EEqVwAHaW2DbgIfHADlVQiqoiIWBruR7aVCUptrPojmtwDM7ATTgJKQGxgtUb9P3vSR8AxxidYoT4WcQEFyRDWGSSSpyxHdDDgudZUaB896fPJdoHBzEuEWKEc9QD03H6eHmNcFoneNPEBId1U6WymsO00N9TPIca3rn1agNTDUflauZCGsDHUr-_6QHUlYXjypVm4apDsOf1Krqj79oHD1eX98PrbHI7Gg8vJpmhgqdMey-wFlbkgiFhvWSaF0xjJK0jfkYIZshwIlm7NDPDDLHc5J4JTamw3NI-OOnurkP93LiY1LJuQtW-VKSQlDLCEPuXwi0hcf5F4Y4yoY4xOK_WoXzSYaMwUlu5qpOrWrlqK1dtM6TLxJat5i78Xv479AmDhXtJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2126091406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>It’s Not Just Counting that Counts: a Reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bluhm, Robyn ; Cabrera, Laura Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Robyn ; Cabrera, Laura Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Gilbert et al. argue that discussions of self-related changes in patients undergoing DBS are overblown. They show that there is little evidence that these changes occur frequently and make recommendations for further research. We point out that their framing of the issue, their methodology, and their recommendations do not attend to other important questions about these changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1874-5490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-5504</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12152-018-9391-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Deep brain stimulation ; Education ; Ethics ; Identity ; Medical ethics ; Neurology ; Neuropsychology ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosciences ; Neurosurgery ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Philosophy</subject><ispartof>Neuroethics, 2021-10, Vol.14 (Suppl 1), p.23-26</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Neuroethics is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-aff81a8d848608df96a756a109de2fb22160c729656acbc6c2d7c4f68a338d7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-aff81a8d848608df96a756a109de2fb22160c729656acbc6c2d7c4f68a338d7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12152-018-9391-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12152-018-9391-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera, Laura Y.</creatorcontrib><title>It’s Not Just Counting that Counts: a Reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen</title><title>Neuroethics</title><addtitle>Neuroethics</addtitle><description>Gilbert et al. argue that discussions of self-related changes in patients undergoing DBS are overblown. They show that there is little evidence that these changes occur frequently and make recommendations for further research. We point out that their framing of the issue, their methodology, and their recommendations do not attend to other important questions about these changes.</description><subject>Deep brain stimulation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><issn>1874-5490</issn><issn>1874-5504</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElOwzAUhi0EEqVwAHaW2DbgIfHADlVQiqoiIWBruR7aVCUptrPojmtwDM7ATTgJKQGxgtUb9P3vSR8AxxidYoT4WcQEFyRDWGSSSpyxHdDDgudZUaB896fPJdoHBzEuEWKEc9QD03H6eHmNcFoneNPEBId1U6WymsO00N9TPIca3rn1agNTDUflauZCGsDHUr-_6QHUlYXjypVm4apDsOf1Krqj79oHD1eX98PrbHI7Gg8vJpmhgqdMey-wFlbkgiFhvWSaF0xjJK0jfkYIZshwIlm7NDPDDLHc5J4JTamw3NI-OOnurkP93LiY1LJuQtW-VKSQlDLCEPuXwi0hcf5F4Y4yoY4xOK_WoXzSYaMwUlu5qpOrWrlqK1dtM6TLxJat5i78Xv479AmDhXtJ</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Bluhm, Robyn</creator><creator>Cabrera, Laura Y.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>It’s Not Just Counting that Counts: a Reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen</title><author>Bluhm, Robyn ; Cabrera, Laura Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-aff81a8d848608df96a756a109de2fb22160c729656acbc6c2d7c4f68a338d7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Deep brain stimulation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera, Laura Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Neuroethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bluhm, Robyn</au><au>Cabrera, Laura Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>It’s Not Just Counting that Counts: a Reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen</atitle><jtitle>Neuroethics</jtitle><stitle>Neuroethics</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>23-26</pages><issn>1874-5490</issn><eissn>1874-5504</eissn><abstract>Gilbert et al. argue that discussions of self-related changes in patients undergoing DBS are overblown. They show that there is little evidence that these changes occur frequently and make recommendations for further research. We point out that their framing of the issue, their methodology, and their recommendations do not attend to other important questions about these changes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12152-018-9391-6</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1874-5490 |
| ispartof | Neuroethics, 2021-10, Vol.14 (Suppl 1), p.23-26 |
| issn | 1874-5490 1874-5504 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2593362606 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Deep brain stimulation Education Ethics Identity Medical ethics Neurology Neuropsychology Neuroradiology Neurosciences Neurosurgery Original Paper Patients Philosophy |
| title | It’s Not Just Counting that Counts: a Reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A47%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=It%E2%80%99s%20Not%20Just%20Counting%20that%20Counts:%20a%20Reply%20to%20Gilbert,%20Via%C3%B1a,%20and%20Ineichen&rft.jtitle=Neuroethics&rft.au=Bluhm,%20Robyn&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=23-26&rft.issn=1874-5490&rft.eissn=1874-5504&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12152-018-9391-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2593362606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2126091406&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |