It’s Not Just Counting that Counts: a Reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen

It’s Not Just Counting that Counts: a Reply to Gilbert, Viaña, and Ineichen

Gilbert et al. argue that discussions of self-related changes in patients undergoing DBS are overblown. They show that there is little evidence that these changes occur frequently and make recommendations for further research. We point out that their framing of the issue, their methodology, and thei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroethics 2021-10, Vol.14 (Suppl 1), p.23-26
Hauptverfasser: Bluhm, Robyn, Cabrera, Laura Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Deep brain stimulation
Education
Ethics
Identity
Medical ethics
Neurology
Neuropsychology
Neuroradiology
Neurosciences
Neurosurgery
Original Paper
Patients
Philosophy
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Gilbert et al. argue that discussions of self-related changes in patients undergoing DBS are overblown. They show that there is little evidence that these changes occur frequently and make recommendations for further research. We point out that their framing of the issue, their methodology, and their recommendations do not attend to other important questions about these changes.
ISSN:1874-5490
1874-5504
DOI:10.1007/s12152-018-9391-6