Production of cello‐oligosaccharides through the biorefinery concept: A technical‐economic and life‐cycle assessment
Producers look for co‐products to increase the value chain and production flexibility. With a high market aggregate value, the production of cello‐oligosaccharides (COS) as functional oligosaccharides from cellulosic substrates has been investigated. As COS/cellopentaose production process are rarel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining bioproducts and biorefining, 2021-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1763-1774 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Producers look for co‐products to increase the value chain and production flexibility. With a high market aggregate value, the production of cello‐oligosaccharides (COS) as functional oligosaccharides from cellulosic substrates has been investigated. As COS/cellopentaose production process are rarely described in the literature, this study estimated the cellopentaose production cost and performed a life‐cycle assessment of the cellopentaose production process previously developed using sugarcane straw as a substrate. The results demonstrated that, through the six scenarios studied, it was possible to obtain a cellopentaose unit production cost varying between USD 0.40 and 1.15/mg, and that optimization in the upstream sector can reduce the total plant direct cost and the overall life‐cycle impact. The results also suggested that a better understanding of the hydrolysis solid/liquid proportion is necessary to reduce the bulk material cost. An environmental impact reduction of between 16.2% and 19.9% was also observed. In terms of the integrated biorefinery concept, sugarcane straw fermentation represents a prospective technology for the production of COS. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1932-104X 1932-1031 |
DOI: | 10.1002/bbb.2276 |