Levels of 15‐HETE and TXB2 in exhaled breath condensates as markers for diagnosis of childhood asthma and its therapeutic outcome
Background Dysregulation of eicosanoids is associated with asthma and a composite of oxylipins, including exhaled leukotriene B4 (LTB4), characterizes childhood asthma. While fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been used as the standard for monitoring steroid responsiveness, the potential uti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric allergy and immunology 2021-11, Vol.32 (8), p.1673-1680 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Dysregulation of eicosanoids is associated with asthma and a composite of oxylipins, including exhaled leukotriene B4 (LTB4), characterizes childhood asthma. While fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been used as the standard for monitoring steroid responsiveness, the potential utility of eicosanoids in monitoring the therapeutic outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to examine the levels of major eicosanoids representing different metabolic pathways in exhaled breath condensates (EBCs) of children with asthma during exacerbation and after treatment.
Methods
Levels of 6 exhaled eicosanoid species in asthmatic children and healthy subjects were evaluated using ELISA.
Results
In addition to those previously reported, including LTB4, the levels of exhaled 15‐hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15‐HETE), but not thromboxane B2 (TXB2), showed significant difference between asthmatics (N = 318) and healthy controls (N = 97), particularly the severe group showed the lowest levels of exhaled 15‐HETE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed similar distinguishing power for the levels of 15‐HETE, FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in the first second), and FeNO, while the 15‐HETE/LTB4 ratio was significantly lower in subjects with asthma as compared to that of healthy controls (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0905-6157 1399-3038 |
DOI: | 10.1111/pai.13587 |