Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism

Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of agricultural science 2021-01, Vol.159 (1-2), p.128-138
Hauptverfasser: Gao, H. Y., Niu, J. S., Liu, W. Q., Zhang, D. L., Li, S. P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 128
container_title The Journal of agricultural science
container_volume 159
creator Gao, H. Y.
Niu, J. S.
Liu, W. Q.
Zhang, D. L.
Li, S. P.
description Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression and grain protein content (GPC) in susceptible (Xi'nong 979) and resistant (Zhengmai 103) wheat cultivars under three treatments. The three treatments were no inoculation (CK), inoculated once with Bgt (MP) and inoculated nine times with Bgt (HP). For Xi'nong 979, the activities of GS and GOGAT in grains as well as GS activity in flag leaves increased at 10–15 days after anthesis (DAA), and decreased significantly at 15 or 20–30 DAA in HP and MP. However, GS activity in grains decreased from 20 DAA, which was later than that of flag leaves (15 DAA). At the same time, GS expression in grains was up-regulated at early stage, with GS1 at 10 DAA and GS2 at 15 DAA, followed by a continuous down-regulation. This result indicated that GS and GOGAT activity as well as GS expression were inhibited by powdery mildew, indicating that N metabolism in grains was inhibited at 20–30 DAA. The current study also found out that the yield of the susceptible cultivar decreased significantly, while its GPC increased obviously in HP. It was shown that the increase of GPC was not due to the enhancement of N metabolism, but due to the passive increase caused by yield reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0021859621000307
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2584163430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859621000307</cupid><sourcerecordid>2584163430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b0ba8dd8b76a7dd7002de7e5a0f9c1351209736e15c5a548f26a19c818742a6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFb_AG8LnqMz2exH8CSlfkDBg3oOm-xsTWmydTel-N-b0oIH8TJzeL_3ZniMXSPcIqC-ewPI0chS5QgAAvQJm2ChykyO85RN9nK218_ZRUqrkdFQmgm7n3tPzcCD57tPsgPfhJ2j-M27du1ox0PPl9G2Pe_bIYYl9byjwdZh3abukp15u050ddxT9vE4f589Z4vXp5fZwyJrBOohq6G2xjlTa2W1c3p8xZEmacGXDQqJOZRaKELZSCsL43NlsWwMGl3kVpGYsptD7iaGry2loVqFbezHk1UuTYFKFAJGCg9UE0NKkXy1iW1n43eFUO07qv50NHrE0WO7OrZuSb_R_7t-AEAHZyE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584163430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Gao, H. Y. ; Niu, J. S. ; Liu, W. Q. ; Zhang, D. L. ; Li, S. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, H. Y. ; Niu, J. S. ; Liu, W. Q. ; Zhang, D. L. ; Li, S. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression and grain protein content (GPC) in susceptible (Xi'nong 979) and resistant (Zhengmai 103) wheat cultivars under three treatments. The three treatments were no inoculation (CK), inoculated once with Bgt (MP) and inoculated nine times with Bgt (HP). For Xi'nong 979, the activities of GS and GOGAT in grains as well as GS activity in flag leaves increased at 10–15 days after anthesis (DAA), and decreased significantly at 15 or 20–30 DAA in HP and MP. However, GS activity in grains decreased from 20 DAA, which was later than that of flag leaves (15 DAA). At the same time, GS expression in grains was up-regulated at early stage, with GS1 at 10 DAA and GS2 at 15 DAA, followed by a continuous down-regulation. This result indicated that GS and GOGAT activity as well as GS expression were inhibited by powdery mildew, indicating that N metabolism in grains was inhibited at 20–30 DAA. The current study also found out that the yield of the susceptible cultivar decreased significantly, while its GPC increased obviously in HP. It was shown that the increase of GPC was not due to the enhancement of N metabolism, but due to the passive increase caused by yield reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859621000307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Airborne microorganisms ; Crops and Soils Research Paper ; Cultivars ; Enzymes ; Fertilizers ; Field tests ; Glutamate-ammonia ligase ; Glutamine ; Grain ; Infections ; Inoculation ; Leaves ; Metabolism ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen metabolism ; Powdery mildew ; Proteins ; Seeds ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-01, Vol.159 (1-2), p.128-138</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b0ba8dd8b76a7dd7002de7e5a0f9c1351209736e15c5a548f26a19c818742a6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b0ba8dd8b76a7dd7002de7e5a0f9c1351209736e15c5a548f26a19c818742a6e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8485-2707</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859621000307/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, H. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, S. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression and grain protein content (GPC) in susceptible (Xi'nong 979) and resistant (Zhengmai 103) wheat cultivars under three treatments. The three treatments were no inoculation (CK), inoculated once with Bgt (MP) and inoculated nine times with Bgt (HP). For Xi'nong 979, the activities of GS and GOGAT in grains as well as GS activity in flag leaves increased at 10–15 days after anthesis (DAA), and decreased significantly at 15 or 20–30 DAA in HP and MP. However, GS activity in grains decreased from 20 DAA, which was later than that of flag leaves (15 DAA). At the same time, GS expression in grains was up-regulated at early stage, with GS1 at 10 DAA and GS2 at 15 DAA, followed by a continuous down-regulation. This result indicated that GS and GOGAT activity as well as GS expression were inhibited by powdery mildew, indicating that N metabolism in grains was inhibited at 20–30 DAA. The current study also found out that the yield of the susceptible cultivar decreased significantly, while its GPC increased obviously in HP. It was shown that the increase of GPC was not due to the enhancement of N metabolism, but due to the passive increase caused by yield reduction.</description><subject>Airborne microorganisms</subject><subject>Crops and Soils Research Paper</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Glutamate-ammonia ligase</subject><subject>Glutamine</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen metabolism</subject><subject>Powdery mildew</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFb_AG8LnqMz2exH8CSlfkDBg3oOm-xsTWmydTel-N-b0oIH8TJzeL_3ZniMXSPcIqC-ewPI0chS5QgAAvQJm2ChykyO85RN9nK218_ZRUqrkdFQmgm7n3tPzcCD57tPsgPfhJ2j-M27du1ox0PPl9G2Pe_bIYYl9byjwdZh3abukp15u050ddxT9vE4f589Z4vXp5fZwyJrBOohq6G2xjlTa2W1c3p8xZEmacGXDQqJOZRaKELZSCsL43NlsWwMGl3kVpGYsptD7iaGry2loVqFbezHk1UuTYFKFAJGCg9UE0NKkXy1iW1n43eFUO07qv50NHrE0WO7OrZuSb_R_7t-AEAHZyE</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Gao, H. Y.</creator><creator>Niu, J. S.</creator><creator>Liu, W. Q.</creator><creator>Zhang, D. L.</creator><creator>Li, S. P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8485-2707</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism</title><author>Gao, H. Y. ; Niu, J. S. ; Liu, W. Q. ; Zhang, D. L. ; Li, S. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b0ba8dd8b76a7dd7002de7e5a0f9c1351209736e15c5a548f26a19c818742a6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Airborne microorganisms</topic><topic>Crops and Soils Research Paper</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Glutamate-ammonia ligase</topic><topic>Glutamine</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen metabolism</topic><topic>Powdery mildew</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, H. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, S. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, H. Y.</au><au>Niu, J. S.</au><au>Liu, W. Q.</au><au>Zhang, D. L.</au><au>Li, S. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>128-138</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><abstract>Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression and grain protein content (GPC) in susceptible (Xi'nong 979) and resistant (Zhengmai 103) wheat cultivars under three treatments. The three treatments were no inoculation (CK), inoculated once with Bgt (MP) and inoculated nine times with Bgt (HP). For Xi'nong 979, the activities of GS and GOGAT in grains as well as GS activity in flag leaves increased at 10–15 days after anthesis (DAA), and decreased significantly at 15 or 20–30 DAA in HP and MP. However, GS activity in grains decreased from 20 DAA, which was later than that of flag leaves (15 DAA). At the same time, GS expression in grains was up-regulated at early stage, with GS1 at 10 DAA and GS2 at 15 DAA, followed by a continuous down-regulation. This result indicated that GS and GOGAT activity as well as GS expression were inhibited by powdery mildew, indicating that N metabolism in grains was inhibited at 20–30 DAA. The current study also found out that the yield of the susceptible cultivar decreased significantly, while its GPC increased obviously in HP. It was shown that the increase of GPC was not due to the enhancement of N metabolism, but due to the passive increase caused by yield reduction.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859621000307</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8485-2707</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8596
ispartof The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-01, Vol.159 (1-2), p.128-138
issn 0021-8596
1469-5146
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2584163430
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Airborne microorganisms
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Cultivars
Enzymes
Fertilizers
Field tests
Glutamate-ammonia ligase
Glutamine
Grain
Infections
Inoculation
Leaves
Metabolism
Nitrogen
Nitrogen metabolism
Powdery mildew
Proteins
Seeds
Wheat
title Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20wheat%20powdery%20mildew%20on%20grain%20nitrogen%20metabolism&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=Gao,%20H.%20Y.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=128-138&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859621000307&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2584163430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584163430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859621000307&rfr_iscdi=true