Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism
Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of agricultural science 2021-01, Vol.159 (1-2), p.128-138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 138 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 128 |
container_title | The Journal of agricultural science |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Gao, H. Y. Niu, J. S. Liu, W. Q. Zhang, D. L. Li, S. P. |
description | Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression and grain protein content (GPC) in susceptible (Xi'nong 979) and resistant (Zhengmai 103) wheat cultivars under three treatments. The three treatments were no inoculation (CK), inoculated once with Bgt (MP) and inoculated nine times with Bgt (HP). For Xi'nong 979, the activities of GS and GOGAT in grains as well as GS activity in flag leaves increased at 10–15 days after anthesis (DAA), and decreased significantly at 15 or 20–30 DAA in HP and MP. However, GS activity in grains decreased from 20 DAA, which was later than that of flag leaves (15 DAA). At the same time, GS expression in grains was up-regulated at early stage, with GS1 at 10 DAA and GS2 at 15 DAA, followed by a continuous down-regulation. This result indicated that GS and GOGAT activity as well as GS expression were inhibited by powdery mildew, indicating that N metabolism in grains was inhibited at 20–30 DAA. The current study also found out that the yield of the susceptible cultivar decreased significantly, while its GPC increased obviously in HP. It was shown that the increase of GPC was not due to the enhancement of N metabolism, but due to the passive increase caused by yield reduction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0021859621000307 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2584163430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859621000307</cupid><sourcerecordid>2584163430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b0ba8dd8b76a7dd7002de7e5a0f9c1351209736e15c5a548f26a19c818742a6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFb_AG8LnqMz2exH8CSlfkDBg3oOm-xsTWmydTel-N-b0oIH8TJzeL_3ZniMXSPcIqC-ewPI0chS5QgAAvQJm2ChykyO85RN9nK218_ZRUqrkdFQmgm7n3tPzcCD57tPsgPfhJ2j-M27du1ox0PPl9G2Pe_bIYYl9byjwdZh3abukp15u050ddxT9vE4f589Z4vXp5fZwyJrBOohq6G2xjlTa2W1c3p8xZEmacGXDQqJOZRaKELZSCsL43NlsWwMGl3kVpGYsptD7iaGry2loVqFbezHk1UuTYFKFAJGCg9UE0NKkXy1iW1n43eFUO07qv50NHrE0WO7OrZuSb_R_7t-AEAHZyE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584163430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Gao, H. Y. ; Niu, J. S. ; Liu, W. Q. ; Zhang, D. L. ; Li, S. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, H. Y. ; Niu, J. S. ; Liu, W. Q. ; Zhang, D. L. ; Li, S. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression and grain protein content (GPC) in susceptible (Xi'nong 979) and resistant (Zhengmai 103) wheat cultivars under three treatments. The three treatments were no inoculation (CK), inoculated once with Bgt (MP) and inoculated nine times with Bgt (HP). For Xi'nong 979, the activities of GS and GOGAT in grains as well as GS activity in flag leaves increased at 10–15 days after anthesis (DAA), and decreased significantly at 15 or 20–30 DAA in HP and MP. However, GS activity in grains decreased from 20 DAA, which was later than that of flag leaves (15 DAA). At the same time, GS expression in grains was up-regulated at early stage, with GS1 at 10 DAA and GS2 at 15 DAA, followed by a continuous down-regulation. This result indicated that GS and GOGAT activity as well as GS expression were inhibited by powdery mildew, indicating that N metabolism in grains was inhibited at 20–30 DAA. The current study also found out that the yield of the susceptible cultivar decreased significantly, while its GPC increased obviously in HP. It was shown that the increase of GPC was not due to the enhancement of N metabolism, but due to the passive increase caused by yield reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859621000307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Airborne microorganisms ; Crops and Soils Research Paper ; Cultivars ; Enzymes ; Fertilizers ; Field tests ; Glutamate-ammonia ligase ; Glutamine ; Grain ; Infections ; Inoculation ; Leaves ; Metabolism ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen metabolism ; Powdery mildew ; Proteins ; Seeds ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-01, Vol.159 (1-2), p.128-138</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b0ba8dd8b76a7dd7002de7e5a0f9c1351209736e15c5a548f26a19c818742a6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b0ba8dd8b76a7dd7002de7e5a0f9c1351209736e15c5a548f26a19c818742a6e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8485-2707</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859621000307/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, H. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, S. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression and grain protein content (GPC) in susceptible (Xi'nong 979) and resistant (Zhengmai 103) wheat cultivars under three treatments. The three treatments were no inoculation (CK), inoculated once with Bgt (MP) and inoculated nine times with Bgt (HP). For Xi'nong 979, the activities of GS and GOGAT in grains as well as GS activity in flag leaves increased at 10–15 days after anthesis (DAA), and decreased significantly at 15 or 20–30 DAA in HP and MP. However, GS activity in grains decreased from 20 DAA, which was later than that of flag leaves (15 DAA). At the same time, GS expression in grains was up-regulated at early stage, with GS1 at 10 DAA and GS2 at 15 DAA, followed by a continuous down-regulation. This result indicated that GS and GOGAT activity as well as GS expression were inhibited by powdery mildew, indicating that N metabolism in grains was inhibited at 20–30 DAA. The current study also found out that the yield of the susceptible cultivar decreased significantly, while its GPC increased obviously in HP. It was shown that the increase of GPC was not due to the enhancement of N metabolism, but due to the passive increase caused by yield reduction.</description><subject>Airborne microorganisms</subject><subject>Crops and Soils Research Paper</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Glutamate-ammonia ligase</subject><subject>Glutamine</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen metabolism</subject><subject>Powdery mildew</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFb_AG8LnqMz2exH8CSlfkDBg3oOm-xsTWmydTel-N-b0oIH8TJzeL_3ZniMXSPcIqC-ewPI0chS5QgAAvQJm2ChykyO85RN9nK218_ZRUqrkdFQmgm7n3tPzcCD57tPsgPfhJ2j-M27du1ox0PPl9G2Pe_bIYYl9byjwdZh3abukp15u050ddxT9vE4f589Z4vXp5fZwyJrBOohq6G2xjlTa2W1c3p8xZEmacGXDQqJOZRaKELZSCsL43NlsWwMGl3kVpGYsptD7iaGry2loVqFbezHk1UuTYFKFAJGCg9UE0NKkXy1iW1n43eFUO07qv50NHrE0WO7OrZuSb_R_7t-AEAHZyE</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Gao, H. Y.</creator><creator>Niu, J. S.</creator><creator>Liu, W. Q.</creator><creator>Zhang, D. L.</creator><creator>Li, S. P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8485-2707</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism</title><author>Gao, H. Y. ; Niu, J. S. ; Liu, W. Q. ; Zhang, D. L. ; Li, S. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b0ba8dd8b76a7dd7002de7e5a0f9c1351209736e15c5a548f26a19c818742a6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Airborne microorganisms</topic><topic>Crops and Soils Research Paper</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Glutamate-ammonia ligase</topic><topic>Glutamine</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen metabolism</topic><topic>Powdery mildew</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, H. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, W. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, S. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, H. Y.</au><au>Niu, J. S.</au><au>Liu, W. Q.</au><au>Zhang, D. L.</au><au>Li, S. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>128-138</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><abstract>Glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) play a central role in plant nitrogen (N) metabolism. In order to study the effect of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, Bgt) on N metabolism, field experiments were carried out to evaluate GS and GOGAT activity, GS expression and grain protein content (GPC) in susceptible (Xi'nong 979) and resistant (Zhengmai 103) wheat cultivars under three treatments. The three treatments were no inoculation (CK), inoculated once with Bgt (MP) and inoculated nine times with Bgt (HP). For Xi'nong 979, the activities of GS and GOGAT in grains as well as GS activity in flag leaves increased at 10–15 days after anthesis (DAA), and decreased significantly at 15 or 20–30 DAA in HP and MP. However, GS activity in grains decreased from 20 DAA, which was later than that of flag leaves (15 DAA). At the same time, GS expression in grains was up-regulated at early stage, with GS1 at 10 DAA and GS2 at 15 DAA, followed by a continuous down-regulation. This result indicated that GS and GOGAT activity as well as GS expression were inhibited by powdery mildew, indicating that N metabolism in grains was inhibited at 20–30 DAA. The current study also found out that the yield of the susceptible cultivar decreased significantly, while its GPC increased obviously in HP. It was shown that the increase of GPC was not due to the enhancement of N metabolism, but due to the passive increase caused by yield reduction.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859621000307</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8485-2707</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8596 |
ispartof | The Journal of agricultural science, 2021-01, Vol.159 (1-2), p.128-138 |
issn | 0021-8596 1469-5146 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2584163430 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Airborne microorganisms Crops and Soils Research Paper Cultivars Enzymes Fertilizers Field tests Glutamate-ammonia ligase Glutamine Grain Infections Inoculation Leaves Metabolism Nitrogen Nitrogen metabolism Powdery mildew Proteins Seeds Wheat |
title | Effect of wheat powdery mildew on grain nitrogen metabolism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20wheat%20powdery%20mildew%20on%20grain%20nitrogen%20metabolism&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=Gao,%20H.%20Y.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=128-138&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859621000307&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2584163430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584163430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859621000307&rfr_iscdi=true |