Game on! How gamified loyalty programs boost customer engagement value
•Though gamification, engagement & loyalty program research abounds, their interface remains nebulous.•In response to this gap, we address this three-way theoretical interface in this paper.•We conceptualize members’ gamified loyalty program engagement (GLPE).•We compose a framework of GLPE and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of information management 2021-12, Vol.61, p.102308, Article 102308 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Though gamification, engagement & loyalty program research abounds, their interface remains nebulous.•In response to this gap, we address this three-way theoretical interface in this paper.•We conceptualize members’ gamified loyalty program engagement (GLPE).•We compose a framework of GLPE and its self-determination theory-based drivers/outcomes.•We conclude by discussing key implications that arise from our analyses.
Though gamified loyalty programs (GLPs), or loyalty programs that deploy gamified elements, are increasingly adopted, academic acumen of customer engagement with GLPs lags behind, thus exposing an important research gap. Based on this gap, we review the gamification-, loyalty program-, and customer engagement literature, from which we derive important insight. First, extending the customer engagement literature, we develop the concept of GLP engagement (GLPE), defined as members’ GLP-related behavior, expressed through direct- (i.e., purchase) and/or indirect (e.g., GLP-related learning/advocating) contributions, which we argue are critical to GLP effectiveness. Extending prior research, we also classify members’ indirect GLP contributions as autonomous (vs. interdependent)-, selfless (vs. self-seeking)-, control (vs. laissez-faire)-based-, collaborative (vs. competitive)-, individual (vs. generic)-, and calculated (vs. non-calculated) contributions. Second, we develop a self-determination theory-informed framework that proposes members’ intrinsic/extrinsic motivation as major drivers of GLPE, which in turn impacts customer brand engagement value (CBEV). Third, formalizing the framework’s associations, we develop a set of Propositions that serve as a springboard for further GLPE research. We conclude by discussing major implications that arise from this research. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-4012 1873-4707 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102308 |