Positive predictive value of sustained virologic response 4 weeks posttreatment for achieving sustained virologic response 12 weeks posttreatment in patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials

Sustained virologic response at posttreatment Week 12 (SVR12) is the widely accepted efficacy endpoint for direct‐acting antiviral agents. Those with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are presenting younger with milder liver disease, potentially reducing need for long‐term liver posttreatment monitoring. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of viral hepatitis 2021-11, Vol.28 (11), p.1635-1642
Hauptverfasser: Gane, Edward, Ledinghen, Victor, Dylla, Douglas E., Rizzardini, Giuliano, Shiffman, Mitchell L., Barclay, Stephen T., Calleja, Jose Luis, Xue, Zhenyi, Burroughs, Margaret, Gutierrez, Julio A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sustained virologic response at posttreatment Week 12 (SVR12) is the widely accepted efficacy endpoint for direct‐acting antiviral agents. Those with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are presenting younger with milder liver disease, potentially reducing need for long‐term liver posttreatment monitoring. This analysis aimed to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of SVR at posttreatment Week 4 (SVR4) for achieving SVR12 in patients with HCV, without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in clinical trials. An integrated dataset from 20 Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of G/P was evaluated in patients with 8‐, 12‐ or 16‐week treatment duration consistent with the current label (label‐consistent group), and in all patients regardless of treatment duration consistency with the current label (overall group). Sensitivity analyses handled missing data either by backward imputation or were excluded. SVR4 PPV, negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity were calculated for achieving SVR12 in both groups, and by treatment duration in the label‐consistent group. SVR was defined as HCV ribonucleic acid 99% in both groups regardless of treatment duration. Not achieving SVR4 had 100% NPV and sensitivity for all groups. SVR4 measure had 79.5% specificity for identifying patients who did not achieve SVR12. Across 20 Phase 2/3 clinical trials of G/P, SVR4 was highly predictive of SVR12. Long‐term follow‐up to confirm SVR may not be necessary for certain populations of patients with HCV.
ISSN:1352-0504
1365-2893
1365-2893
DOI:10.1111/jvh.13600