Calibration of cavity pressure simulation using autoencoder and multilayer perceptron neural networks

Numerical simulations of polymer melt flow behavior in cavities help predict and optimize injection molding process parameters. However, simulation and actual results may differ because of simplified mathematical models, inaccurate processing conditions, material property settings, and machine aging...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymer engineering and science 2021-10, Vol.61 (10), p.2511-2521
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Ming‐Shyan, Liu, Chun‐Yin, Ke, Kun‐Cheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Numerical simulations of polymer melt flow behavior in cavities help predict and optimize injection molding process parameters. However, simulation and actual results may differ because of simplified mathematical models, inaccurate processing conditions, material property settings, and machine aging, among other factors. Therefore, simulated optimal process parameters cannot be directly applied in practice. This study applied machine learning to generate a virtual–actual correction model to improve the accuracy of simulation results, especially the cavity pressure profile, a key indicator of injection‐molding quality for identifying ideal process parameter settings such as filling‐to‐packing switchover time and holding pressure. This method does not require big data for model training to enhance its practicality. Therefore, the correction model is only suitable for specific settings. A set of injection molding machines, molds, and processed materials were used for experimental verification. An autoencoder model was used to extract the features of simulation and actual cavity pressure curves. Then, a multilayer perceptron model was used to determine a relationship between simulation and actual features. The autoencoder was used to decode simulated features into cavity pressure curves. The proposed method was verified with dumbbell‐shaped specimens; the correlation between simulated and actual cavity pressures was greatly improved from 81% to 98%.
ISSN:0032-3888
1548-2634
DOI:10.1002/pen.25777