Robust worst-practice interval DEA with non-discretionary factors
•A new robust worst-practice model is formulated.•A numerical example and a case study are provided to validate the suggested model.•Monte-Carlo simulation is used to select parameters for the suggested robust model. Traditionally, data envelopment analysis (DEA) evaluates the performance of decisio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Expert systems with applications 2021-11, Vol.182, p.115256, Article 115256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •A new robust worst-practice model is formulated.•A numerical example and a case study are provided to validate the suggested model.•Monte-Carlo simulation is used to select parameters for the suggested robust model.
Traditionally, data envelopment analysis (DEA) evaluates the performance of decision-making units (DMUs) with the most favorable weights on the best practice frontier. In this regard, less emphasis is placed on non-performing or distressed DMUs. To identify the worst performers in risk-taking industries, the worst-practice frontier (WPF) DEA model has been proposed. However, the model does not assume evaluation in the condition that the environment is uncertain. In this paper, we examine the WPF-DEA from basics and further propose novel robust WPF-DEA models in the presence of interval data uncertainty and non-discretionary factors. The proposed approach is based on robust optimization where uncertain input and output data are constrained in an uncertainty set. We first discuss the applicability of worst-practice DEA models to a broad range of application domains and then consider the selection of worst-performing suppliers in supply chain decision analysis where some factors are unknown and not under varied discretion of management. Using the Monte-Carlo simulation, we compute the conformity of rankings in the interval efficiency as well as determine the price of robustness for selecting the worst-performing suppliers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0957-4174 1873-6793 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115256 |