A comparison of digital chest radiography and Xpert® MTB/RIF in active case finding for tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE: To compare two community screening tests for TB: sputum examination using Xpert® MTB/RIF and chest radiography (CXR).METHOD: Men aged ≥15 years and women aged >45 years living in 96 sub-communes in Ca Mau, Viet Nam, were invited to provide a single sputum specimen that was tested using Xpert. Participants were also invited to attend a nearby location for digital radiography. Participants whose sputum was Xpert MTB-positive or whose CXR was reported as 'consistent with TB´ were requested to provide two further sputum specimens for culture. The sensitivities of the two tests for detecting TB (defined as sputum culture-positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis) were compared.RESULTS: There were 72 985 eligible participants, of whom 57 597 (78.9%) participated in Xpert screening, 12 752 (17.5%) had CXR and 11 235 (15.4%) had both tests. We estimated that there were 59 cases of TB, of whom 20 were Xpert MTB-positive (programmatic sensitivity 34.0%) and 47 had CXR reported as 'consistent with TB´ (sensitivity 80.0%, P < 0.0001).CONCLUSION: In community-wide screening for TB, CXR is more sensitive than a single spontaneously expectorated sputum sample tested using Xpert, but it has a substantially lower participation rate.