Thermal and electrical performances of actively cooled concentrator photovoltaic system
•Reliable thermal management for CPV is mandatory for efficient/safe operation.•3D heat transfer/thermal model for DL-MCHS coupled with CPV layers are developed.•Including and ignoring the header of DL-MCHS is considered in the simulation work.•Without headers, CPV/T system attained a lower average...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied thermal engineering 2021-09, Vol.196, p.117295, Article 117295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Reliable thermal management for CPV is mandatory for efficient/safe operation.•3D heat transfer/thermal model for DL-MCHS coupled with CPV layers are developed.•Including and ignoring the header of DL-MCHS is considered in the simulation work.•Without headers, CPV/T system attained a lower average and local cell temperature.•With headers, electrical efficiency is improved while pumping power is augmented.
The double-layer microchannel heat sink (DL-MCHS) is commonly applied for thermal management of high heat flux surfaces, including electronic chips and concentrator photovoltaic (CPV). However, most of the recent studies neglected the header effect in the simulation of the DL-MCHS. The current study compressively investigated the impact of considering the inlet and outlet headers on the CPV systems' performance. A three-dimensional conjugate heat transfer model of the fluid flow in the DL-MCHS coupled with the CPV layers' thermal model was employed. The thermal performances of DL-MCHS with and without considering the headers were evaluated. Parallel flow (PF) and counter flow (CF) conditions at a solar concentration ratio (CR) of 20 suns were studied. The results showed that the header section should be considered in the numerical model for obtaining a more realistic average and local silicon layer temperature profile, especially in the CF operation. For instance, the difference in solar cell temperature between including and ignoring the header section is about 13.86 K for CF operation at CR of 20 and 200 ml/hr coolant flowrate. The predicted pumping power and net gained electric power were also significantly affected by neglecting the headers in the numerical modelling. The electrical efficiency deviation reached about 23.5% at CF, while PF reported almost 4.0%. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1359-4311 1873-5606 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117295 |