Benchmarking of deep learning irradiance forecasting models from sky images – An in-depth analysis

[Display omitted] •Four common deep learning models were trained to forecast irradiance from sky images.•They achieved around 20% forecast skill on the 10 min ahead prediction.•A consistent temporal lag strongly limits their ability to anticipate future events.•Stronger focus on the dynamic aspect o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy 2021-08, Vol.224, p.855-867
Hauptverfasser: Paletta, Quentin, Arbod, Guillaume, Lasenby, Joan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 867
container_issue
container_start_page 855
container_title Solar energy
container_volume 224
creator Paletta, Quentin
Arbod, Guillaume
Lasenby, Joan
description [Display omitted] •Four common deep learning models were trained to forecast irradiance from sky images.•They achieved around 20% forecast skill on the 10 min ahead prediction.•A consistent temporal lag strongly limits their ability to anticipate future events.•Stronger focus on the dynamic aspect of the forecast is key for event prediction. A number of industrial applications, such as smart grids, power plant operation, hybrid system management or energy trading, could benefit from improved short-term solar forecasting, addressing the intermittent energy production from solar panels. However, current approaches to modelling the cloud cover dynamics from sky images still lack precision regarding the spatial configuration of clouds, their temporal dynamics and physical interactions with solar radiation. Benefiting from a growing number of large datasets, data driven methods are being developed to address these limitations with promising results. In this study, we compare four commonly used deep learning architectures trained to forecast solar irradiance from sequences of hemispherical sky images and exogenous variables. To assess the relative performance of each model, we used the forecast skill metric based on the smart persistence model, as well as ramp and time distortion metrics. The results show that encoding spatiotemporal aspects of the sequence of sky images greatly improved the predictions with 10 min ahead forecast skill reaching 20.4% on the test year. However, based on the experimental data, we conclude that, with a common setup, deep learning models tend to behave just as a ‘very smart persistence model’, temporally aligned with the persistence model while mitigating its most penalising errors. Thus, despite being captured by the sky cameras, models often miss fundamental events causing large irradiance changes such as clouds obscuring the sun. We hope that our work will contribute to a shift of this approach to irradiance forecasting, from reactive to anticipatory.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.056
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2572615214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038092X21004266</els_id><sourcerecordid>2572615214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-205871e97922e6ce015b3d8054f347450e51458f3e698e438d1cd062076fd3ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1KxDAQhYMouK4-ghDwunWSNv25knXxDwRvFLwLsZnupts2NekKe-c7-IY-iSm798LAwMw5h5mPkEsGMQOWXTexty326GIOnMUgQmVHZMbSnEWMi_yYzACSIoKSv5-SM-8bAJazIp8RfYt9te6U25h-RW1NNeJAW1SunwbGOaWN6iuktXVYKT9O485qbD2tne2o3-yo6dQKPf39_qGLnpo-0jiMa6p61e688efkpFatx4tDn5O3-7vX5WP0_PLwtFw8R1UqYIw4iCJnWOYl55hVCEx8JLoAkdZJmgcJCpaKok4wKwtMk0KzSkPGIc9qnShM5uRqnzs4-7lFP8rGbl04wstAgWdMcJYGldirKme9d1jLwYUH3E4ykBNQ2cgDUDkBlSBCZcF3s_eF1_HLhK2vTKCH2gQyo9TW_JPwB1T8gis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572615214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benchmarking of deep learning irradiance forecasting models from sky images – An in-depth analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Paletta, Quentin ; Arbod, Guillaume ; Lasenby, Joan</creator><creatorcontrib>Paletta, Quentin ; Arbod, Guillaume ; Lasenby, Joan</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Four common deep learning models were trained to forecast irradiance from sky images.•They achieved around 20% forecast skill on the 10 min ahead prediction.•A consistent temporal lag strongly limits their ability to anticipate future events.•Stronger focus on the dynamic aspect of the forecast is key for event prediction. A number of industrial applications, such as smart grids, power plant operation, hybrid system management or energy trading, could benefit from improved short-term solar forecasting, addressing the intermittent energy production from solar panels. However, current approaches to modelling the cloud cover dynamics from sky images still lack precision regarding the spatial configuration of clouds, their temporal dynamics and physical interactions with solar radiation. Benefiting from a growing number of large datasets, data driven methods are being developed to address these limitations with promising results. In this study, we compare four commonly used deep learning architectures trained to forecast solar irradiance from sequences of hemispherical sky images and exogenous variables. To assess the relative performance of each model, we used the forecast skill metric based on the smart persistence model, as well as ramp and time distortion metrics. The results show that encoding spatiotemporal aspects of the sequence of sky images greatly improved the predictions with 10 min ahead forecast skill reaching 20.4% on the test year. However, based on the experimental data, we conclude that, with a common setup, deep learning models tend to behave just as a ‘very smart persistence model’, temporally aligned with the persistence model while mitigating its most penalising errors. Thus, despite being captured by the sky cameras, models often miss fundamental events causing large irradiance changes such as clouds obscuring the sun. We hope that our work will contribute to a shift of this approach to irradiance forecasting, from reactive to anticipatory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-092X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-1257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cameras ; Cloud cover ; Clouds ; Computer Vision ; Convolutional Neural Networks ; Deep Learning ; Economic forecasting ; Forecasting ; Hybrid systems ; Industrial applications ; Irradiance ; Mathematical models ; Power plant operation ; Power plants ; Sky Images ; Smart grid ; Solar energy ; Solar irradiance ; Solar panels ; Solar radiation</subject><ispartof>Solar energy, 2021-08, Vol.224, p.855-867</ispartof><rights>2021 International Solar Energy Society</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-205871e97922e6ce015b3d8054f347450e51458f3e698e438d1cd062076fd3ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-205871e97922e6ce015b3d8054f347450e51458f3e698e438d1cd062076fd3ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paletta, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbod, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasenby, Joan</creatorcontrib><title>Benchmarking of deep learning irradiance forecasting models from sky images – An in-depth analysis</title><title>Solar energy</title><description>[Display omitted] •Four common deep learning models were trained to forecast irradiance from sky images.•They achieved around 20% forecast skill on the 10 min ahead prediction.•A consistent temporal lag strongly limits their ability to anticipate future events.•Stronger focus on the dynamic aspect of the forecast is key for event prediction. A number of industrial applications, such as smart grids, power plant operation, hybrid system management or energy trading, could benefit from improved short-term solar forecasting, addressing the intermittent energy production from solar panels. However, current approaches to modelling the cloud cover dynamics from sky images still lack precision regarding the spatial configuration of clouds, their temporal dynamics and physical interactions with solar radiation. Benefiting from a growing number of large datasets, data driven methods are being developed to address these limitations with promising results. In this study, we compare four commonly used deep learning architectures trained to forecast solar irradiance from sequences of hemispherical sky images and exogenous variables. To assess the relative performance of each model, we used the forecast skill metric based on the smart persistence model, as well as ramp and time distortion metrics. The results show that encoding spatiotemporal aspects of the sequence of sky images greatly improved the predictions with 10 min ahead forecast skill reaching 20.4% on the test year. However, based on the experimental data, we conclude that, with a common setup, deep learning models tend to behave just as a ‘very smart persistence model’, temporally aligned with the persistence model while mitigating its most penalising errors. Thus, despite being captured by the sky cameras, models often miss fundamental events causing large irradiance changes such as clouds obscuring the sun. We hope that our work will contribute to a shift of this approach to irradiance forecasting, from reactive to anticipatory.</description><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Cloud cover</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Computer Vision</subject><subject>Convolutional Neural Networks</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Economic forecasting</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Hybrid systems</subject><subject>Industrial applications</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Power plant operation</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Sky Images</subject><subject>Smart grid</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar irradiance</subject><subject>Solar panels</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><issn>0038-092X</issn><issn>1471-1257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkN1KxDAQhYMouK4-ghDwunWSNv25knXxDwRvFLwLsZnupts2NekKe-c7-IY-iSm798LAwMw5h5mPkEsGMQOWXTexty326GIOnMUgQmVHZMbSnEWMi_yYzACSIoKSv5-SM-8bAJazIp8RfYt9te6U25h-RW1NNeJAW1SunwbGOaWN6iuktXVYKT9O485qbD2tne2o3-yo6dQKPf39_qGLnpo-0jiMa6p61e688efkpFatx4tDn5O3-7vX5WP0_PLwtFw8R1UqYIw4iCJnWOYl55hVCEx8JLoAkdZJmgcJCpaKok4wKwtMk0KzSkPGIc9qnShM5uRqnzs4-7lFP8rGbl04wstAgWdMcJYGldirKme9d1jLwYUH3E4ykBNQ2cgDUDkBlSBCZcF3s_eF1_HLhK2vTKCH2gQyo9TW_JPwB1T8gis</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Paletta, Quentin</creator><creator>Arbod, Guillaume</creator><creator>Lasenby, Joan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Benchmarking of deep learning irradiance forecasting models from sky images – An in-depth analysis</title><author>Paletta, Quentin ; Arbod, Guillaume ; Lasenby, Joan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-205871e97922e6ce015b3d8054f347450e51458f3e698e438d1cd062076fd3ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Cloud cover</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Computer Vision</topic><topic>Convolutional Neural Networks</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Economic forecasting</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Hybrid systems</topic><topic>Industrial applications</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Power plant operation</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Sky Images</topic><topic>Smart grid</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar irradiance</topic><topic>Solar panels</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paletta, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbod, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasenby, Joan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paletta, Quentin</au><au>Arbod, Guillaume</au><au>Lasenby, Joan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benchmarking of deep learning irradiance forecasting models from sky images – An in-depth analysis</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>224</volume><spage>855</spage><epage>867</epage><pages>855-867</pages><issn>0038-092X</issn><eissn>1471-1257</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Four common deep learning models were trained to forecast irradiance from sky images.•They achieved around 20% forecast skill on the 10 min ahead prediction.•A consistent temporal lag strongly limits their ability to anticipate future events.•Stronger focus on the dynamic aspect of the forecast is key for event prediction. A number of industrial applications, such as smart grids, power plant operation, hybrid system management or energy trading, could benefit from improved short-term solar forecasting, addressing the intermittent energy production from solar panels. However, current approaches to modelling the cloud cover dynamics from sky images still lack precision regarding the spatial configuration of clouds, their temporal dynamics and physical interactions with solar radiation. Benefiting from a growing number of large datasets, data driven methods are being developed to address these limitations with promising results. In this study, we compare four commonly used deep learning architectures trained to forecast solar irradiance from sequences of hemispherical sky images and exogenous variables. To assess the relative performance of each model, we used the forecast skill metric based on the smart persistence model, as well as ramp and time distortion metrics. The results show that encoding spatiotemporal aspects of the sequence of sky images greatly improved the predictions with 10 min ahead forecast skill reaching 20.4% on the test year. However, based on the experimental data, we conclude that, with a common setup, deep learning models tend to behave just as a ‘very smart persistence model’, temporally aligned with the persistence model while mitigating its most penalising errors. Thus, despite being captured by the sky cameras, models often miss fundamental events causing large irradiance changes such as clouds obscuring the sun. We hope that our work will contribute to a shift of this approach to irradiance forecasting, from reactive to anticipatory.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.056</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-092X
ispartof Solar energy, 2021-08, Vol.224, p.855-867
issn 0038-092X
1471-1257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2572615214
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Cameras
Cloud cover
Clouds
Computer Vision
Convolutional Neural Networks
Deep Learning
Economic forecasting
Forecasting
Hybrid systems
Industrial applications
Irradiance
Mathematical models
Power plant operation
Power plants
Sky Images
Smart grid
Solar energy
Solar irradiance
Solar panels
Solar radiation
title Benchmarking of deep learning irradiance forecasting models from sky images – An in-depth analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A49%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benchmarking%20of%20deep%20learning%20irradiance%20forecasting%20models%20from%20sky%20images%20%E2%80%93%20An%20in-depth%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy&rft.au=Paletta,%20Quentin&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=224&rft.spage=855&rft.epage=867&rft.pages=855-867&rft.issn=0038-092X&rft.eissn=1471-1257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2572615214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572615214&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038092X21004266&rfr_iscdi=true