Benchmarking of deep learning irradiance forecasting models from sky images – An in-depth analysis
[Display omitted] •Four common deep learning models were trained to forecast irradiance from sky images.•They achieved around 20% forecast skill on the 10 min ahead prediction.•A consistent temporal lag strongly limits their ability to anticipate future events.•Stronger focus on the dynamic aspect o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Solar energy 2021-08, Vol.224, p.855-867 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Four common deep learning models were trained to forecast irradiance from sky images.•They achieved around 20% forecast skill on the 10 min ahead prediction.•A consistent temporal lag strongly limits their ability to anticipate future events.•Stronger focus on the dynamic aspect of the forecast is key for event prediction.
A number of industrial applications, such as smart grids, power plant operation, hybrid system management or energy trading, could benefit from improved short-term solar forecasting, addressing the intermittent energy production from solar panels. However, current approaches to modelling the cloud cover dynamics from sky images still lack precision regarding the spatial configuration of clouds, their temporal dynamics and physical interactions with solar radiation. Benefiting from a growing number of large datasets, data driven methods are being developed to address these limitations with promising results. In this study, we compare four commonly used deep learning architectures trained to forecast solar irradiance from sequences of hemispherical sky images and exogenous variables. To assess the relative performance of each model, we used the forecast skill metric based on the smart persistence model, as well as ramp and time distortion metrics. The results show that encoding spatiotemporal aspects of the sequence of sky images greatly improved the predictions with 10 min ahead forecast skill reaching 20.4% on the test year. However, based on the experimental data, we conclude that, with a common setup, deep learning models tend to behave just as a ‘very smart persistence model’, temporally aligned with the persistence model while mitigating its most penalising errors. Thus, despite being captured by the sky cameras, models often miss fundamental events causing large irradiance changes such as clouds obscuring the sun. We hope that our work will contribute to a shift of this approach to irradiance forecasting, from reactive to anticipatory. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0038-092X 1471-1257 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.056 |