Evaluating the Evidence on Vertical Mergers

In theory, vertical mergers can have both procompetitive and anticompetitive effects. Many early empirical studies found benefits for vertical relationships; but the seminal surveys of this literature are now over a decade old. We review the empirical evidence from the last decade on vertical integr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of industrial organization 2021-09, Vol.59 (2), p.273-302
Hauptverfasser: Beck, Marissa, Morton, Fiona Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In theory, vertical mergers can have both procompetitive and anticompetitive effects. Many early empirical studies found benefits for vertical relationships; but the seminal surveys of this literature are now over a decade old. We review the empirical evidence from the last decade on vertical integration—as well as that in two frequently cited surveys from the mid-2000s. Taken as a whole, the empirical evidence as to the change in welfare that is due to vertical mergers is decidedly mixed, and should certainly not be used as a basis for a presumption that most vertical mergers are pro-competitive or harmless.
ISSN:0889-938X
1573-7160
DOI:10.1007/s11151-021-09832-z