A study on damage evolution in Cu-TiO2 composite fabricated at different temperatures and strain rates

Copper/Titanium Dioxide (CuTiO2) samples were fabricated at three temperatures (450 °C, 650 °C, 850 °C) using: a universal testing machine (quasi-statically at the strain rate of 8 נ10–3 s−1), a drop Hammer (dynamically at the strain rate of about 8 נ102 s−1), and a modified Split Hopkinson Pressure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials research express 2021-09, Vol.8 (9), p.095004
Hauptverfasser: Jafari, S S, Majzoobi, G H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Copper/Titanium Dioxide (CuTiO2) samples were fabricated at three temperatures (450 °C, 650 °C, 850 °C) using: a universal testing machine (quasi-statically at the strain rate of 8 נ10–3 s−1), a drop Hammer (dynamically at the strain rate of about 8 נ102 s−1), and a modified Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (strain rate of about 1.6 נ103 s−1). The effects of reinforcing particle size on relative density and damage parameter of Cu reinforced by 0, 2.5, 5 and 10% volume fractions of nano- and micro-sized TiO2 were investigated. The results indicated that the size of TiO2 particles, loading rate, and temperature had significant effect on relative density and damage parameter. The results also showed that the Quasi-Static method was superior to the other two methods. In addition, by increasing temperature, the mechanical properties of the composites were improved. The results showed that the effect of nano sized reinforcement particles on damage parameter was more profound than micro sized reinforcement particles. In this work, a new damage model considering the effects of strain rate, temperature, volume fraction and the aspect ratio of particles on damage parameter was proposed. The damage parameter was obtained using relative density and elasticity modulus. The results showed significant difference between the two methods. However, the density method yields more accurate and realistic results.
ISSN:2053-1591
DOI:10.1088/2053-1591/ac2052