Comparison of LQG and Adaptive PID Controller for USV Heading Control

This paper considers USV heading controller using Adaptive PID and LQG controller. PID is a conventional controller and the most industry controller. However, PID parameters are selected by trial and error. That problem proposed Adaptive PID how to tune PID parameters. In this paper, PID parameters...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2019-05, Vol.1218 (1), p.12058
Hauptverfasser: Asfihani, Tahiyatul, Khusnul Arif, Didik, Subchan, Priyatno Putra, Firdaus, Ardi Firmansyah, Moch
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper considers USV heading controller using Adaptive PID and LQG controller. PID is a conventional controller and the most industry controller. However, PID parameters are selected by trial and error. That problem proposed Adaptive PID how to tune PID parameters. In this paper, PID parameters are estimated by RLS method. The second controller for comparison is LQG. LQG controller is robust controller. A gain regulator estimation method, Kalman Filter, is used as LQG controller. The computational results show the LQG controller has better performance than Adaptive PID.
ISSN:1742-6588
1742-6596
DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1218/1/012058