Automatic diagnostic tool for predicting cancer grade in bladder cancer patients using deep learning
The most common type of bladder cancer is urothelial carcinoma, which is among the cancer types with the highest recurrence rate and lifetime treatment cost per patient. Diagnosed patients are stratified into risk groups, mainly based on grade and stage. However, it is well known that correct gradin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE access 2021-01, Vol.9, p.1-1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The most common type of bladder cancer is urothelial carcinoma, which is among the cancer types with the highest recurrence rate and lifetime treatment cost per patient. Diagnosed patients are stratified into risk groups, mainly based on grade and stage. However, it is well known that correct grading of bladder cancer suffers from intra-and interobserver variability and inconsistent reproducibility between pathologists, potentially leading to under-or overtreatment of the patients. The economic burden, unnecessary patient suffering, and additional load on the health care system illustrate the importance of developing new tools to aid pathologists. We propose a pipeline, called TRI_{grade}, that will identify diagnostic relevant regions in the whole-slide image (WSI) and collectively predict the grade of the current WSI. The system consists of two main models, trained on weak slide-level grade labels. First, a WSI is segmented into the different tissue classes (urothelium, stroma, muscle, blood, damaged tissue, and background). Next, tiles are extracted from the diagnostic relevant urothelium tissue from three magnification levels (25x, 100x, and 400x) and processed sequentially by a convolutional neural network (CNN) based model. Ten models were trained for the slide-level grading experiment, where the best model achieved an F1-score of 0.90 on a test set consisting of 50 WSIs. The best model was further evaluated on a smaller segmentation test set, consisting of 14 WSIs where low-and high-grade regions were annotated by a pathologist. The TRI_{grade} pipeline achieved an average F1-score of 0.91 for both the low-grade and high-grade classes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
DOI: | 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3104724 |