854-P: A Statewide Needs Assessment to Inform Best Practices for the Ohio Cardiovascular and Diabetes Health Collaborative (Cardi-OH)

Background: Funded by the Ohio Department of Medicaid, the Ohio Cardiovascular and Diabetes Health Collaborative (Cardi-OH) unites the 7 medical schools in Ohio to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The purpose of this needs assessment was to identify...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2021-06, Vol.70 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: BEVERLY, ELIZABETH A., DUNGAN, KATHLEEN M., WRIGHT, JACKSON T., CARON, ALEECE, CLEMONS, MARILEE, RENNER, SARAH ALDRICH, GAWLIK, KATE, SAJATOVIC, MARTHA, RAO, GOUTHAM, SOLOMON, GLEN D., HOLLIDAY, MICHAEL B., LEWIS, JESSIE, NEVAR, ANN, SWIATKOWSKI, SHANNON M., KONSTAN, MICHAEL W., BOLEN, SHARI D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Funded by the Ohio Department of Medicaid, the Ohio Cardiovascular and Diabetes Health Collaborative (Cardi-OH) unites the 7 medical schools in Ohio to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The purpose of this needs assessment was to identify high priority educational topics for the dissemination of evidenced-based best practices. Methods: Questions surveyed collaborative members’ familiarity with guidelines, educational topics, and barriers to care. Results: A total of 111 out of 123 members completed the needs assessment (90.2% response rate). Half (49.5%, n=55) were familiar with the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines for hypertension, whereas only 36.9% (n=41) were familiar with the 2020 ADA guidelines. The 3 topics of most interest were: 1) social determinants of health (SDOH, 55.9%, n=62), 2) lifestyle approaches to T2D (40.5%, n=45), and 3) new therapies for T2D (32.4%, n=36). Fifty-nine members (53.2%) provided direct clinical care; the others worked in research and public health. Providers estimated 25% of their T2D patients had A1C values >9.0%. Providers listed the 3 most common patient self-care barriers as: 1) lack of patient motivation (65.5%, n=38), 2) lack of patient education (60.3%, n=35), and 3) limited formularies and prior authorizations (41.4%, n=24). The 3 most common reasons for clinical inertia were: 1) lack of patient education (50.0%, n=29), 2) competing priorities (46.6%, n=27), and 3) lack of patient motivation (44.8%, n=26). Providers felt payers could help them with: 1) transportation (61.0%, n=68), 2) coverage of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES, 59.4%, n=66), and 3) obtaining glucose monitors (45.9%, n=51). Conclusions: Top priorities for future evidence-based best practices are SDOH, patient engagement, and addressing complexity of care. Payers should prioritize increased coverage for DSMES and simplification of ordering monitoring supplies.
ISSN:0012-1797
1939-327X
DOI:10.2337/db21-854-P