The effect of pulmonary vein isolation geometry on procedure duration and patient outcomes

Background: The optimal technique to deliver enduring pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency is under scrutiny with the introduction of Ablation Index technology and the CLOSE protocol. Modern techniques to deliver RF ablation lesions encircling the pulmonary veins often follow a nephro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology 2019-01, Vol.5, p.63
Hauptverfasser: Leung, L, Bhatti, A, Gonna, H, A Li, Bajpai, A, Zuberi, Z, Saba, M, Sohal, M, Gallagher, M M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The optimal technique to deliver enduring pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency is under scrutiny with the introduction of Ablation Index technology and the CLOSE protocol. Modern techniques to deliver RF ablation lesions encircling the pulmonary veins often follow a nephroid geometry and in this study, this is compared to the traditional wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) geometric lesion set. The effect on procedure duration and patient outcomes are studied. Methods: This is a single centre retrospective comparative study of two different pulmonary vein isolation protocols for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Protocol 1 is the PVI-nephroid geometry group and protocol 2 is the PVI-traditional geometry group. The procedure duration (minutes) and 1-year patient outcomes (freedom from the treated arrhythmia) across the two groups were studied. Six experienced senior operators contributed to the study and PVI cases in the study period of 2017–8 were included. The operators clearly followed either the PVI-nephroid geometry approach or the PVI-traditional method. Apart from geometric differences in the PVI lesion set, the two groups both adhere to the same point-by-point lesion delivery method, Ablation Index parameters (30–40 W; 350–450 at posterior and anterior settings) with inter-lesion distance of
ISSN:2058-3869
2058-3877