RBDN: Residual Bottleneck Dense Network for Image Super-Resolution
Recent studies have shown that a super-resolution generative adversarial network (SRGAN) can significantly improve the quality of single-image super-resolution. However, existing SRGAN methods also have certain drawbacks, such as an insufficient feature utilization, a large number of parameters. To...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE access 2021, Vol.9, p.103440-103451 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recent studies have shown that a super-resolution generative adversarial network (SRGAN) can significantly improve the quality of single-image super-resolution. However, existing SRGAN methods also have certain drawbacks, such as an insufficient feature utilization, a large number of parameters. To further enhance the visual quality, we thoroughly studied three key components of SRGAN, i.e., the network architecture, adversarial loss, and perceptual loss, and propose a DenseNet with Residual-in-Residual Bottleneck Block (RRBB), called a residual bottleneck dense network (RBDN), for single-image super-resolution. First, to improve the utilization of features between the various layers of the network, we adopted a dense cascading connection between layers. At the same time, to reduce the computational cost, we added a bottleneck structure to each layer, greatly reducing the number of network parameters and accelerating the convergence speed of the training process. Second, the proposed RRBB, as the basic network building unit, removes the batch normalization (BN) layer and employs the ELU function to reduce the opposite effects in the absence of BN. In addition, we applied an improved overall loss function during the model training process to stably train the model and further improve the realism of the reconstructed high-resolution image. To prove the superiority of our proposed model, we conducted a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio, structural similarity, learned perceptual image patch similarity, and other evaluation indicators obtained from the three test sets, i.e., Set5, Set14, and BSD100, from the recent state-of-the-art model. Finally, we conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses of the results obtained in terms of the evaluation indicators, the authenticity of the restored HR images, and textural details, which show the superiority of the RBDN model. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
DOI: | 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3096548 |