Simulation of Wellbore Drilling Energy Saving of Nanofluids Using an Experimental Taylor–Couette Flow System

Power consumption of wellbore drilling in oil and gas exploitations count for 40% of total costs, hence power saving of WBM (water-based mud) by adding different concentrations of Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 and SiO 2 nanoparticles is investigated here. A high-speed Taylor–Couette system (TCS) was devised to o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 2021-07, Vol.11 (7), p.2963-2979
Hauptverfasser: Rashidi, Masoud, Sedaghat, Ahmad, Misbah, Biltayib, Sabati, Mohammad, Vaidyan, Koshy, Mostafaeipour, Ali, Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin, Almutairi, Khalid, Issakhov, Alibek, Oloomi, Seyed Amir Abbas, Malayer, Mahdi Ashtian, Arockia Dhanraj, Joshuva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Power consumption of wellbore drilling in oil and gas exploitations count for 40% of total costs, hence power saving of WBM (water-based mud) by adding different concentrations of Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 and SiO 2 nanoparticles is investigated here. A high-speed Taylor–Couette system (TCS) was devised to operate at speeds 0–1600 RPM to simulate power consumption of wellbore drilling using nanofluids in laminar to turbulent flow conditions. The TCS control unit uses several sensors to record current, voltage and rotational speed and Arduino microprocessors to process outputs including rheological properties and power consumption. Total power consumption of the TCS was correlated with a second-order polynomial function of rotational speed for different nanofluids, and the correlated parameters were found using an optimization technique. For the first time, energy saving of three nanofluids at four low volume concentrations 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 and 1% is investigated in the TCS simulating wellbore drilling operation. It is interesting to observe that the lower concentration nanofluids (0.05%) have better power savings. In average, for the lower concentration nanofluids (0.05%), power was saved by 39%, 30% and 26% for TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 WBM nanofluids, respectively. TiO 2 nanofluids have better power saving at lower concentrations of 0.05 and 0.1%, while Al 2 O 3 nanofluids have saved more power at higher concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0% compared with their counterpart nanofluids.
ISSN:2190-0558
2190-0566
DOI:10.1007/s13202-021-01227-w