Almost global problems in the LOCAL model

The landscape of the distributed time complexity is nowadays well-understood for subpolynomial complexities. When we look at deterministic algorithms in the LOCAL model and locally checkable problems ( LCL s) in bounded-degree graphs, the following picture emerges: There are lots of problems with ti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Distributed computing 2021-08, Vol.34 (4), p.259-281
Hauptverfasser: Balliu, Alkida, Brandt, Sebastian, Olivetti, Dennis, Suomela, Jukka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The landscape of the distributed time complexity is nowadays well-understood for subpolynomial complexities. When we look at deterministic algorithms in the LOCAL model and locally checkable problems ( LCL s) in bounded-degree graphs, the following picture emerges: There are lots of problems with time complexities of Θ ( log ∗ n ) or Θ ( log n ) . It is not possible to have a problem with complexity between ω ( log ∗ n ) and o ( log n ) . In general graphs , we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between ω ( log n ) and n o ( 1 ) . In trees , problems with such complexities do not exist. However, the high end of the complexity spectrum was left open by prior work. In general graphs there are LCL problems with complexities of the form Θ ( n α ) for any rational 0 < α ≤ 1 / 2 , while for trees only complexities of the form Θ ( n 1 / k ) are known. No LCL problem with complexity between ω ( n ) and o ( n ) is known, and neither are there results that would show that such problems do not exist. We show that: In general graphs , we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between ω ( n ) and o ( n ). In trees , problems with such complexities do not exist. Put otherwise, we show that any LCL with a complexity o ( n ) can be solved in time O ( n ) in trees, while the same is not true in general graphs.
ISSN:0178-2770
1432-0452
DOI:10.1007/s00446-020-00375-2