Efficacy of uncovered colonic stents for extrinsic versus intrinsic malignant large bowel obstruction

Background Previous studies evaluating self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) for management of malignant extrinsic colon obstruction have yielded conflicting results. We evaluated the efficacy of uncovered SEMS for extrinsic colon malignancy (ECM) versus intrinsic colon malignancy (ICM). Methods Retro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.4511-4519
Hauptverfasser: Weston, Brian R., Patel, Jigar M., Pande, Mala, Lum, Phillip J., Ross, William A., Raju, Gottumukkala S., Lynch, Patrick M., Coronel, Emmanuel, Ge, Phillip S., Lee, Jeffrey H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Previous studies evaluating self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) for management of malignant extrinsic colon obstruction have yielded conflicting results. We evaluated the efficacy of uncovered SEMS for extrinsic colon malignancy (ECM) versus intrinsic colon malignancy (ICM). Methods Retrospective review of all patients referred for colonic SEMS at a tertiary cancer center between 2007 and 2018 was performed. Primary outcome measures were technical success, clinical success, intervention rate, and overall survival. Results 138 patients with ECM and 119 patients with ICM underwent attempted stent placement. The rectum and/or sigmoid colon was the most common stricture site. Technical success was lower in the ECM group [86% vs 96% ( p  = .009)]. Clinical success was lower in the ECM group both at 7 days [82% vs 95% ( p  = .004)] and at 90 days [60% vs 86% ( p  
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07965-y