Optimization of Eucalyptus breeding through random regression models allowing for reaction norms in response to environmental gradients
Reaction norms fitted through random regression models are a powerful tool to identify and quantify the genotype × environment (G × E) interaction and they represent a promising alternative in forest tree breeding for analysis of multi-environment trials. Thus, the objective of this study was to com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tree genetics & genomes 2020-04, Vol.16 (2), Article 38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Reaction norms fitted through random regression models are a powerful tool to identify and quantify the genotype × environment (G × E) interaction and they represent a promising alternative in forest tree breeding for analysis of multi-environment trials. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare random regression models with the compound symmetry model in
Eucalyptus
breeding for analysis of multi-environment trials. To this end, a data set with 215
Eucalyptus
clones of different species and hybrids evaluated in four environments for diameter at breast height and Pilodyn penetration was used. The random regression models provided a better fit for both traits. Results showed that there was genotypic variability among
Eucalyptus
clones and that the reaction norms over the environmental gradients identified the G × E interaction. The compound symmetry model and the random regression models are highly correlated in terms of genotype ranking for both traits. The main advantage of random regression models over the compound symmetry model is the ability to predict genotypic performance in environments where a genotype has not been evaluated. Thus, our results suggest that reaction norms fitted through random regression models can be successfully used in forest tree breeding for analysis of multi-environment trials. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1614-2942 1614-2950 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11295-020-01431-5 |