A Replication of Stern, West, and Schmitt (2014) Indicates Less False Consensus Among Liberals Than Conservatives, But No False Uniqueness
Stern, West, and Schmitt (2014) reported that liberals display truly false uniqueness in contrast to moderates and conservatives who display truly false consensus. We conducted a close, preregistered replication of Stern et al.'s (2014) research with a large sample (N = 1,005). Liberals, modera...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social psychology (Göttingen, Germany) Germany), 2021-05, Vol.52 (3), p.197-202 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Stern, West, and Schmitt
(2014) reported that liberals display truly false uniqueness in
contrast to moderates and conservatives who display truly false consensus. We
conducted a close, preregistered replication of Stern et al.'s (2014) research with a
large sample (N = 1,005). Liberals, moderates, and
conservatives demonstrated the truly false consensus effect by overestimating
ingroup consensus. False consensus was strongest among conservatives, followed
by moderates, and weakest among liberals. However, liberals did score higher
than moderates and conservatives on the need for uniqueness scale, which
partially accounted for the difference in false consensus between liberals and
conservatives. Overall, our data align with Stern et al.'s (2014) in demonstrating left-right
ideological differences in the overestimation of ingroup consensus but fall
short of illustrating a liberal illusion of uniqueness. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1864-9335 2151-2590 |
DOI: | 10.1027/1864-9335/a000448 |